From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A59225332E for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 21:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743023929; cv=none; b=GjvioOZ/S/VbGuU6wHMvpauuxMrKeqaGa8Dx13BDZxqj8+h7GAesxMzKH1+zQOMsZ5g4hRAtnIVjExOc1J87thHtBetmLCyp72VmdswLx38evVlcm1erZrdc71MEeyXx9v34r+5V3MugYT5jVMzCMks5kr+2Ov62P1IbYrLzSxQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1743023929; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Cokp8Ir4vMKQAE/tbGOZCkWah19q1JW/KBUQIt9Yq1s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LXNqpUAInUMZHVi4ol4N4eVc0fmPpd+7pZ5JlJzBZkhdDIfGu1fN+gBkgAvOqCKh3NkFTlO555jdHu8zCYaY/RxYFpenBKJhlt9GMX/9AUxPlNNwSKnvlfDqnoDQZ1i/Ta/Y+7H4s3MJ8uxo3KVgNTnw7XOboJS8TdINAtBKkf0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=T4YlRZLm; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=lGue/+OL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="T4YlRZLm"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="lGue/+OL" Received: by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id C6E0060602; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:18:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1743023925; bh=JqPoPQ/QwLVwURos4c8/T+noZTlFnCF2aQsDZJ1vEHk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=T4YlRZLmbCBoQgVgPHt6HBHHqncztKsVQGFWjoZ35Mz9LOU50J1zi7koei1dAmnUj UfSgWT921Oh7AxrTO8dMjRjUIf5GUS0uTjOK7UGDBTQhOuti3I9HWMibNmFfAIQCDO K/285zxTD6PkvKq9eXCcAgOImYCfnWU0cwZM+dSE7TxmYvtFe3uQX8jNNqf/pDYGRy B2uMF3wzA28jNjrgw+AFu4K8+j1UeOSU42efbuMGtBx1jIqjz+ptpTRyfZp3L8i5B5 oZgLeZ0k/K5yR7zDgmcv7wPP9YZjhOT5To6FToukpWMJL0JRKxw7bjJ89TEkBIHD9T ltpu2IHLX2pzw== X-Spam-Level: Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F0BD605EA; Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:18:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1743023924; bh=JqPoPQ/QwLVwURos4c8/T+noZTlFnCF2aQsDZJ1vEHk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=lGue/+OLj4yk27iBkD+YXpkJvn/Ozgdt+3x7IJKdXMbHTiwmBCX+tlaK+87AwYuZy jl29H2xs2HOBTMz6mI+LIenVmFtr/yAMHdU3qTr7KKGnJwxHRo6rRD32Tb5NcIniyB FqopnOCB+J1UylntMVuWLyeLq+47imuB1nG7VRAWX/mfRdB2E/3TWB63pyZXy/Mzrj kf0Bqd1ctkNTf1wMOilG1mXTUeKpnIAEctkizRqpR4iXieKyzqsRIEbV6VxezebVKm xU0GJK21Eyy6VeqI/4mcGBSXIrCZ6GdhOpxrv8fsfpXhYfFkWtuxf0ji1Ng3c2l+nD OSMg3lYVsacAA== Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 22:18:41 +0100 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: Florian Westphal , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, Jozsef Kadlecsik , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [net-next v3 0/3] Disable LEGACY iptables on PREEMPT_RT Message-ID: References: <20250325165832.3110004-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20250325194804.GA18860@breakpoint.cc> <20250326074721.Y1sIc4Al@linutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250326074721.Y1sIc4Al@linutronix.de> Hi Sebastian, On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 08:47:21AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 2025-03-25 20:48:04 [+0100], Florian Westphal wrote: > > I applied following diff on top of this series, after that > > ./iptables-test.py -n > > and > > iptables/tests/shell/run-tests.sh > > > > pass (legacy version fails as expected). > > The change in xt_mark is awkward but its the only place that > > needs it so its not worth to add a new kconfig symbol to avoid || > > test. > > Thank you. I'm going to fold this into 1/3. Unless Florian says otherwise, I suggest you collapse these three patches in one, my initial patch 1/3 in this series is indeed very much incomplete. Thanks for catching up on this.