* [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation
@ 2025-03-24 11:52 Florian Westphal
2025-03-27 15:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2025-03-24 11:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel; +Cc: Florian Westphal
Don't rely on a successful evaluation of set->key.
With this input, set->key fails validation but subsequent
element evaluation asserts because the context points at
the set key -- an empty concatenation.
Causes:
nft: src/evaluate.c:1681: expr_evaluate_concat: Assertion `!list_empty(&ctx->ectx.key->expressions)' failed.
After patch:
internal:0:0-0: Error: unqualified type specified in set definition. Try "typeof expression" instead of "type datatype".
internal:0:0-0: Error: Could not parse symbolic invalid expression
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
---
src/evaluate.c | 10 +++++--
...pr_evaluate_concat_empty_concat_key_assert | 27 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tests/shell/testcases/bogons/nft-j-f/expr_evaluate_concat_empty_concat_key_assert
diff --git a/src/evaluate.c b/src/evaluate.c
index 1e7f6f53542b..a6b08cf3b1b5 100644
--- a/src/evaluate.c
+++ b/src/evaluate.c
@@ -1645,6 +1645,13 @@ static int list_member_evaluate(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct expr **expr)
return err;
}
+static bool ctx_has_concat_key(const struct eval_ctx *ctx)
+{
+ /* Ignore empty concatenation key, set eval queued an error */
+ return ctx->ectx.key && ctx->ectx.key->etype == EXPR_CONCAT &&
+ !list_empty(&ctx->ectx.key->expressions);
+}
+
static int expr_evaluate_concat(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct expr **expr)
{
const struct datatype *dtype = ctx->ectx.dtype, *tmp;
@@ -1657,9 +1664,8 @@ static int expr_evaluate_concat(struct eval_ctx *ctx, struct expr **expr)
bool runaway = false;
uint32_t size = 0;
- if (ctx->ectx.key && ctx->ectx.key->etype == EXPR_CONCAT) {
+ if (ctx_has_concat_key(ctx)) {
key_ctx = ctx->ectx.key;
- assert(!list_empty(&ctx->ectx.key->expressions));
key = list_first_entry(&ctx->ectx.key->expressions, struct expr, list);
expressions = &ctx->ectx.key->expressions;
}
diff --git a/tests/shell/testcases/bogons/nft-j-f/expr_evaluate_concat_empty_concat_key_assert b/tests/shell/testcases/bogons/nft-j-f/expr_evaluate_concat_empty_concat_key_assert
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..956ecdc99721
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/shell/testcases/bogons/nft-j-f/expr_evaluate_concat_empty_concat_key_assert
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+{
+ "nftables": [
+ {
+ "table": { "family": "ip",
+ "name": "t",
+ "handle": 0
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ "set": {
+ "family": "ip",
+ "name": "s",
+ "table": "t",
+ "type": [
+ ],
+ "elem": [
+ {
+ "concat": [
+ "foo", "bar"
+ ]
+ }
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+ ]
+}
+
--
2.48.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation
2025-03-24 11:52 [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation Florian Westphal
@ 2025-03-27 15:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-03-27 15:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2025-03-27 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal; +Cc: netfilter-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 674 bytes --]
Hi Florian,
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Don't rely on a successful evaluation of set->key.
> With this input, set->key fails validation but subsequent
> element evaluation asserts because the context points at
> the set key -- an empty concatenation.
>
> Causes:
> nft: src/evaluate.c:1681: expr_evaluate_concat: Assertion `!list_empty(&ctx->ectx.key->expressions)' failed.
>
> After patch:
> internal:0:0-0: Error: unqualified type specified in set definition. Try "typeof expression" instead of "type datatype".
> internal:0:0-0: Error: Could not parse symbolic invalid expression
Maybe block this from the json parser itself?
[-- Attachment #2: x.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 569 bytes --]
diff --git a/src/parser_json.c b/src/parser_json.c
index 17bc38b565ae..8d5aa480ae04 100644
--- a/src/parser_json.c
+++ b/src/parser_json.c
@@ -3395,6 +3395,14 @@ static struct cmd *json_parse_cmd_add_set(struct json_ctx *ctx, json_t *root,
return NULL;
}
+ if (set->key->etype == EXPR_CONCAT &&
+ list_empty(&set->key->expressions)) {
+ json_error(ctx, "Empty set type.");
+ set_free(set);
+ handle_free(&h);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
if (!json_unpack(root, "{s:o}", "map", &tmp)) {
if (json_is_string(tmp)) {
const char *s = json_string_value(tmp);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation
2025-03-27 15:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2025-03-27 15:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-03-27 15:49 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2025-03-27 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal; +Cc: netfilter-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 860 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 04:33:59PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Don't rely on a successful evaluation of set->key.
> > With this input, set->key fails validation but subsequent
> > element evaluation asserts because the context points at
> > the set key -- an empty concatenation.
> >
> > Causes:
> > nft: src/evaluate.c:1681: expr_evaluate_concat: Assertion `!list_empty(&ctx->ectx.key->expressions)' failed.
> >
> > After patch:
> > internal:0:0-0: Error: unqualified type specified in set definition. Try "typeof expression" instead of "type datatype".
> > internal:0:0-0: Error: Could not parse symbolic invalid expression
>
> Maybe block this from the json parser itself?
Maybe this instead? This covers for empty concatenation in both set
key and set data.
[-- Attachment #2: x.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 752 bytes --]
commit e0123be7a908d1a4b7c43d0817b9ecccf2bd1416
Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Thu Mar 27 16:32:16 2025 +0100
parser_json: reject empty concatention in set key and data
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
diff --git a/src/parser_json.c b/src/parser_json.c
index 17bc38b565ae..513e0b10f028 100644
--- a/src/parser_json.c
+++ b/src/parser_json.c
@@ -1729,6 +1729,13 @@ static struct expr *json_parse_dtype_expr(struct json_ctx *ctx, json_t *root)
}
compound_expr_add(expr, i);
}
+
+ if (list_empty(&expr->expressions)) {
+ json_error(ctx, "Empty concatenation");
+ expr_free(expr);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
return expr;
} else if (json_is_object(root)) {
const char *key;
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation
2025-03-27 15:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2025-03-27 15:49 ` Florian Westphal
2025-03-27 15:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2025-03-27 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso; +Cc: Florian Westphal, netfilter-devel
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > Don't rely on a successful evaluation of set->key.
> > > With this input, set->key fails validation but subsequent
> > > element evaluation asserts because the context points at
> > > the set key -- an empty concatenation.
> > >
> > > Causes:
> > > nft: src/evaluate.c:1681: expr_evaluate_concat: Assertion `!list_empty(&ctx->ectx.key->expressions)' failed.
> > >
> > > After patch:
> > > internal:0:0-0: Error: unqualified type specified in set definition. Try "typeof expression" instead of "type datatype".
> > > internal:0:0-0: Error: Could not parse symbolic invalid expression
> >
> > Maybe block this from the json parser itself?
>
> Maybe this instead? This covers for empty concatenation in both set
> key and set data.
I don't like the idea of having to keep double-error-checks in
both json and bison frontends.
I would prefer a generic solution where possible, unless
there is some other advantage such as better error reporting.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation
2025-03-27 15:49 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2025-03-27 15:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-03-27 15:55 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2025-03-27 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal; +Cc: netfilter-devel
On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 04:49:10PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 12:52:58PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > > > Don't rely on a successful evaluation of set->key.
> > > > With this input, set->key fails validation but subsequent
> > > > element evaluation asserts because the context points at
> > > > the set key -- an empty concatenation.
> > > >
> > > > Causes:
> > > > nft: src/evaluate.c:1681: expr_evaluate_concat: Assertion `!list_empty(&ctx->ectx.key->expressions)' failed.
> > > >
> > > > After patch:
> > > > internal:0:0-0: Error: unqualified type specified in set definition. Try "typeof expression" instead of "type datatype".
> > > > internal:0:0-0: Error: Could not parse symbolic invalid expression
> > >
> > > Maybe block this from the json parser itself?
> >
> > Maybe this instead? This covers for empty concatenation in both set
> > key and set data.
>
> I don't like the idea of having to keep double-error-checks in
> both json and bison frontends.
>
> I would prefer a generic solution where possible, unless
> there is some other advantage such as better error reporting.
I have been trying to trigger this from the bison parser, but I could
not.
I think assertion are still useful to denote something is very broken
if we get to the evaluation step with an empty concatenation.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation
2025-03-27 15:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2025-03-27 15:55 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2025-03-27 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso; +Cc: Florian Westphal, netfilter-devel
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> I think assertion are still useful to denote something is very broken
> if we get to the evaluation step with an empty concatenation.
OK, then please push put your fix then.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-03-27 15:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-24 11:52 [PATCH nft] evaluate: tolerate empty concatenation Florian Westphal
2025-03-27 15:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-03-27 15:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-03-27 15:49 ` Florian Westphal
2025-03-27 15:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-03-27 15:55 ` Florian Westphal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).