From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Cc: kadlec@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
jiejiang@chromium.org, jasongustaman@chromium.org,
garrick@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: conntrack: fix wrong ct->timeout value
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 12:11:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZD++Tztor/BvG+ZY@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZD+a+R6+OgXm4QFZ@calendula>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 855 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 09:40:44AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 01:15:26PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > (struct nf_conn)->timeout is an interval before the conntrack
> > confirmed. After confirmed, it becomes a timestamp[1].
> >
> > It is observed that timeout of an unconfirmed conntrack:
> > - Set by calling ctnetlink_change_timeout(). As a result,
> > `nfct_time_stamp` was wrongly added to `ct->timeout` twice[2].
> > - Get by calling ctnetlink_dump_timeout(). As a result,
> > `nfct_time_stamp` was wrongly subtracted[3].
> >
> > Separate the 2 cases in:
> > - Setting `ct->timeout` in __nf_ct_set_timeout().
> > - Getting `ct->timeout` in ctnetlink_dump_timeout().
>
> Applied, thanks
I have to amend this patch, I have to collapsed the attached chunk.
Otherwise conntrack creation via ctnetlink breaks.
[-- Attachment #2: x.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 834 bytes --]
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
index d3ee18854698..d65290646f63 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
@@ -2253,9 +2253,6 @@ ctnetlink_create_conntrack(struct net *net,
if (!cda[CTA_TIMEOUT])
goto err1;
- timeout = (u64)ntohl(nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_TIMEOUT])) * HZ;
- __nf_ct_set_timeout(ct, timeout);
-
rcu_read_lock();
if (cda[CTA_HELP]) {
char *helpname = NULL;
@@ -2319,6 +2316,9 @@ ctnetlink_create_conntrack(struct net *net,
/* we must add conntrack extensions before confirmation. */
ct->status |= IPS_CONFIRMED;
+ timeout = (u64)ntohl(nla_get_be32(cda[CTA_TIMEOUT])) * HZ;
+ __nf_ct_set_timeout(ct, timeout);
+
if (cda[CTA_STATUS]) {
err = ctnetlink_change_status(ct, cda);
if (err < 0)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-19 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-19 5:15 [PATCH v3] netfilter: conntrack: fix wrong ct->timeout value Tzung-Bi Shih
2023-04-19 7:40 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-04-19 10:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZD++Tztor/BvG+ZY@calendula \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=garrick@chromium.org \
--cc=jasongustaman@chromium.org \
--cc=jiejiang@chromium.org \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox