Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Cc: kadlec@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	jiejiang@chromium.org, jasongustaman@chromium.org,
	garrick@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: fix wrong ct->timeout value
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 00:56:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZDc3AUBoKMUzPfKi@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZDPeGu4eznqw34VJ@google.com>

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 05:59:54PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:31:21AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 10:33:32AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 02:09:35PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:
> > > > (struct nf_conn)->timeout is an interval before the conntrack
> > > > confirmed.  After confirmed, it becomes a timestamp[1].
> > > > 
> > > > It is observed that timeout of an unconfirmed conntrack have been
> > > > altered by calling ctnetlink_change_timeout().  As a result,
> > > > `nfct_time_stamp` was wrongly added to `ct->timeout` twice[2].
> > > > 
> > > > Differentiate the 2 cases in all `ct->timeout` accesses.
> > > 
> > > You can just skip refreshing the timeout for unconfirmed conntrack
> > > entries in ctnetlink_change_timeout().
> > 
> > Something like this patch probably?
> 
> Pardon me, I sent a v2[3] before seeing the message.
> 
> [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/20230410093454.853575-1-tzungbi@kernel.org/T/#u
> 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> > index bfc3aaa2c872..6556f5f30844 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> > @@ -2466,7 +2466,8 @@ static int ctnetlink_new_conntrack(struct sk_buff *skb,
> >  
> >  	err = -EEXIST;
> >  	ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
> > -	if (!(info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL)) {
> > +	if (!(info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL) &&
> > +	    nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct)) {
> >  		err = ctnetlink_change_conntrack(ct, cda);
> >  		if (err == 0) {
> >  			nf_conntrack_eventmask_report((1 << IPCT_REPLY) |
> 
> The patch can't fix the issue we observed.
> 
> Here is the calling stack:
>   ctnetlink_glue_parse
>   [...]
>   __sys_sendto
>   __x64_sys_sendto
>   [...]

I see. So this is from nfqueue path, now I understand better, thanks.

Maybe just do this special handling:

+       if (nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct))
+               WRITE_ONCE(ct->timeout, timeout + nfct_time_stamp);
+       else
+               WRITE_ONCE(ct->timeout, timeout);

for ctnetlink_change_timeout().

Just replace __nf_ct_set_timeout(), by this code above in
nf_conntrack_netlink.c? I think the __nf_ct_set_timeout() helper is
not very useful.

Better not to cripple features, even if this was broken :-).

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-10  6:09 [PATCH] netfilter: conntrack: fix wrong ct->timeout value Tzung-Bi Shih
2023-04-10  8:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-04-10  9:31   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-04-10  9:59     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2023-04-12 22:56       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2023-04-13  3:23         ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2023-04-13  9:04           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-04-14  3:52             ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2023-04-14  8:12               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-04-17  3:41                 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2023-04-18  8:17                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-04-19  5:20                     ` Tzung-Bi Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZDc3AUBoKMUzPfKi@calendula \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=garrick@chromium.org \
    --cc=jasongustaman@chromium.org \
    --cc=jiejiang@chromium.org \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox