From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>
To: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
Cc: pablo@netfilter.org, kadlec@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
coreteam@netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] netfilter: conntrack: validate cta_ip via parsing
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 14:16:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZK6nwn99T8NAP6pC@corigine.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230711032257.3561166-1-linma@zju.edu.cn>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:22:57AM +0800, Lin Ma wrote:
> In current ctnetlink_parse_tuple_ip() function, nested parsing and
> validation is splitting as two parts. This is unnecessary as the
> nla_parse_nested_deprecated function supports validation in the fly.
> These two finially reach same place __nla_validate_parse with same
> validate flag.
>
> nla_parse_nested_deprecated
> __nla_parse(.., NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL, ..)
> __nla_validate_parse
>
> nla_validate_nested_deprecated
> __nla_validate_nested(.., NL_VALIDATE_LIBERAL, ..)
> __nla_validate
> __nla_validate_parse
>
> This commit removes the call to nla_validate_nested_deprecated and pass
> cta_ip_nla_policy when do parsing.
>
> Fixes: 8cb081746c03 ("netlink: make validation more configurable for future strictness")
I don't think this warrants a fixes tag, as it's not fixing any
user-visible behaviour. Rather, it is a clean-up.
> Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> index 69c8c8c7e9b8..334db22199c1 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> @@ -1321,15 +1321,11 @@ static int ctnetlink_parse_tuple_ip(struct nlattr *attr,
> struct nlattr *tb[CTA_IP_MAX+1];
> int ret = 0;
>
> - ret = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, CTA_IP_MAX, attr, NULL, NULL);
> + ret = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(tb, CTA_IP_MAX, attr,
> + cta_ip_nla_policy, NULL);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = nla_validate_nested_deprecated(attr, CTA_IP_MAX,
> - cta_ip_nla_policy, NULL);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> switch (tuple->src.l3num) {
> case NFPROTO_IPV4:
> ret = ipv4_nlattr_to_tuple(tb, tuple, flags);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-12 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 3:22 [PATCH v1] netfilter: conntrack: validate cta_ip via parsing Lin Ma
2023-07-12 13:16 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2023-07-12 13:26 ` Lin Ma
2023-07-13 8:52 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZK6nwn99T8NAP6pC@corigine.com \
--to=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linma@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).