From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
Cc: NetFilter <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft 7/9] expression: cleanup expr_ops_by_type() and handle u32 input
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 20:13:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQs2Pmq6J5ZdXDQb@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230920142958.566615-8-thaller@redhat.com>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 04:26:08PM +0200, Thomas Haller wrote:
> Be more careful about casting an uint32_t value to "enum expr_types" and
> make fewer assumptions about the underlying integer type of the enum.
> Instead, be clear about where we have an untrusted uint32_t from netlink
> and an enum. Rename expr_ops_by_type() to expr_ops_by_type_u32() to make
> this clearer. Later we might make the enum as packed, when this starts
> to matter more.
>
> Also, only the code path expr_ops() wants strict validation and assert
> against valid enum values. Move the assertion out of
> __expr_ops_by_type(). Then expr_ops_by_type_u32() does not need to
> duplicate the handling of EXPR_INVALID. We still need to duplicate the
> check against EXPR_MAX, to ensure that the uint32_t value can be cast to
> an enum value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Haller <thaller@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/expression.h | 2 +-
> src/expression.c | 23 +++++++++++------------
> src/netlink.c | 4 ++--
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/expression.h b/include/expression.h
> index 469f41ecd613..aede223db741 100644
> --- a/include/expression.h
> +++ b/include/expression.h
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ struct expr_ops {
> };
>
> const struct expr_ops *expr_ops(const struct expr *e);
> -const struct expr_ops *expr_ops_by_type(enum expr_types etype);
> +const struct expr_ops *expr_ops_by_type_u32(uint32_t value);
>
> /**
> * enum expr_flags
> diff --git a/src/expression.c b/src/expression.c
> index 87d5a9fcbe09..320c02be522c 100644
> --- a/src/expression.c
> +++ b/src/expression.c
> @@ -995,7 +995,7 @@ static struct expr *concat_expr_parse_udata(const struct nftnl_udata *attr)
> goto err_free;
>
> etype = nftnl_udata_get_u32(nest_ud[NFTNL_UDATA_SET_KEY_CONCAT_SUB_TYPE]);
> - ops = expr_ops_by_type(etype);
> + ops = expr_ops_by_type_u32(etype);
> if (!ops || !ops->parse_udata)
> goto err_free;
>
> @@ -1509,9 +1509,7 @@ void range_expr_value_high(mpz_t rop, const struct expr *expr)
> static const struct expr_ops *__expr_ops_by_type(enum expr_types etype)
> {
> switch (etype) {
> - case EXPR_INVALID:
> - BUG("Invalid expression ops requested");
> - break;
> + case EXPR_INVALID: break;
> case EXPR_VERDICT: return &verdict_expr_ops;
> case EXPR_SYMBOL: return &symbol_expr_ops;
> case EXPR_VARIABLE: return &variable_expr_ops;
> @@ -1543,21 +1541,22 @@ static const struct expr_ops *__expr_ops_by_type(enum expr_types etype)
> case EXPR_FLAGCMP: return &flagcmp_expr_ops;
> }
>
> - BUG("Unknown expression type %d\n", etype);
> + return NULL;
> }
>
> const struct expr_ops *expr_ops(const struct expr *e)
> {
> - return __expr_ops_by_type(e->etype);
> + const struct expr_ops *ops;
> +
> + ops = __expr_ops_by_type(e->etype);
> + if (!ops)
> + BUG("Unknown expression type %d\n", e->etype);
> + return ops;
> }
>
> -const struct expr_ops *expr_ops_by_type(enum expr_types value)
> +const struct expr_ops *expr_ops_by_type_u32(uint32_t value)
> {
> - /* value might come from unreliable source, such as "udata"
> - * annotation of set keys. Avoid BUG() assertion.
> - */
> - if (value == EXPR_INVALID || value > EXPR_MAX)
> + if (value > (uint32_t) EXPR_MAX)
I think this still allows a third party to set EXPR_INVALID in the
netlink userdata attribute, right?
> return NULL;
> -
> return __expr_ops_by_type(value);
> }
> diff --git a/src/netlink.c b/src/netlink.c
> index 70ebf382b14f..8af579c7b778 100644
> --- a/src/netlink.c
> +++ b/src/netlink.c
> @@ -878,8 +878,8 @@ static struct expr *set_make_key(const struct nftnl_udata *attr)
> {
> const struct nftnl_udata *ud[NFTNL_UDATA_SET_TYPEOF_MAX + 1] = {};
> const struct expr_ops *ops;
> - enum expr_types etype;
> struct expr *expr;
> + uint32_t etype;
> int err;
>
> if (!attr)
> @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static struct expr *set_make_key(const struct nftnl_udata *attr)
> return NULL;
>
> etype = nftnl_udata_get_u32(ud[NFTNL_UDATA_SET_TYPEOF_EXPR]);
> - ops = expr_ops_by_type(etype);
> + ops = expr_ops_by_type_u32(etype);
> if (!ops)
> return NULL;
>
> --
> 2.41.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-20 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-20 14:26 [PATCH nft 0/9] various cleanups related to enums and struct datatype Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 14:26 ` [PATCH nft 1/9] src: fix indentation/whitespace Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 16:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 14:26 ` [PATCH nft 2/9] include: fix missing definitions in <cache.h>/<headers.h> Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 14:26 ` [PATCH nft 3/9] datatype: drop flags field from datatype Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 18:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 19:23 ` Thomas Haller
2023-09-21 14:23 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-22 8:51 ` Thomas Haller
2023-09-22 11:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 14:26 ` [PATCH nft 4/9] datatype: use "enum byteorder" instead of int in set_datatype_alloc() Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 16:27 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 14:26 ` [PATCH nft 5/9] payload: use enum icmp_hdr_field_type in payload_may_dependency_kill_icmp() Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 16:32 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 14:26 ` [PATCH nft 6/9] netlink: handle invalid etype in set_make_key() Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 16:22 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 16:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 14:26 ` [PATCH nft 7/9] expression: cleanup expr_ops_by_type() and handle u32 input Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 18:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2023-09-20 19:28 ` Thomas Haller
2023-09-21 14:19 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-22 8:54 ` Thomas Haller
2023-09-22 9:56 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-25 8:44 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 14:26 ` [PATCH nft 8/9] datatype: use __attribute__((packed)) instead of enum bitfields Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 16:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 17:48 ` Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 18:07 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 16:46 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2023-09-20 14:26 ` [PATCH nft 9/9] proto: add missing proto_definitions for PROTO_DESC_GENEVE Thomas Haller
2023-09-20 16:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZQs2Pmq6J5ZdXDQb@calendula \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thaller@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).