Re: [RFC] nftables 1.0.6 -stable backports

[Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>]

On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 12:29:12PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 11:56:52AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 11:49:30AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 11:44:43AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 10:59:25AM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > [...]
> > > > > One would have to change it to work based on *.y branches and the actual
> > > > > commits in there. I'll give it a quick try, shouldn't be too hard
> > > > > indeed.
> > > > 
> > > > Please kindly find attached a "stable branch fork" of
> > > > collect_backports.sh. I was too lazy to check its output for missing
> > > > commits, but the ones it returns seem entirely valid.
> > > 
> > > Would you mind to post the list of missing commits in 1.0.6.y?
> > > 
> > > I am too lazy to run it.
> > > 
> > 
> > eac68b84227a3fc46572f3bae1113eaa91d13f24
> 
> taken.
> 
> > 8519ab031d8022999603a69ee9f18e8cfb06645d
> 
> taken.
> 
> > 4e8aa050312822400124260bf6b630c3c05cb04d
> 
> taken.
> 
> > f65b2d12236174d477c55e96c4027cd51185ba5e
> 
> skipped for tests/shell.
> 
> > 122dce6b35205a3df419a5cae9acfd6e83e8725a
> 
> taken.
> 
> These two below, I don't find in my tree (script woes!):
> 
> > e4c9f9f7e0d1f83be18f6c4a418da503e9021b24
> > d392ddf243dcbf8a34726c777d2c669b1e8bfa85

Refresh your repo, these are the top two commits in nftables.git.