netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
Cc: kadlec@netfilter.org, fw@strlen.de,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	kernel-team@cloudflare.com, jgriege@cloudflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] netfilter: nf_tables: allow NFPROTO_INET in nft_(match/target)_validate()
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:52:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZdcnfnoEE10cV7gL@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240222103308.7910-1-ignat@cloudflare.com>

Hi Ignat,

On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 10:33:08AM +0000, Ignat Korchagin wrote:
> Commit d0009effa886 ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate NFPROTO_* family") added
> some validation of NFPROTO_* families in the nft_compat module, but it broke
> the ability to use legacy iptables modules in dual-stack nftables.
> 
> While with legacy iptables one had to independently manage IPv4 and IPv6
> tables, with nftables it is possible to have dual-stack tables sharing the
> rules. Moreover, it was possible to use rules based on legacy iptables
> match/target modules in dual-stack nftables.
> 
> As an example, the program from [2] creates an INET dual-stack family table
> using an xt_bpf based rule, which looks like the following (the actual output
> was generated with a patched nft tool as the current nft tool does not parse
> dual stack tables with legacy match rules, so consider it for illustrative
> purposes only):
> 
> table inet testfw {
>   chain input {
>     type filter hook prerouting priority filter; policy accept;
>     bytecode counter packets 0 bytes 0 accept
>   }
> }

This nft command does not exist in tree, this does not restores fine
with nft -f. It provides a misleading hint to the reader.

I am fine with restoring this because you use it, but you have to find
a better interface than using nft_compat to achieve this IMO.

The upstream consensus this far is not to expose nft_compat features
through userspace nft. But as said, I understand and I am fine with
restoring kernel behaviour so you can keep going with your out-of-tree
patch.

Thanks !

> After d0009effa886 ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate NFPROTO_* family") we get
> EOPNOTSUPP for the above program.
> 
> Fix this by allowing NFPROTO_INET for nft_(match/target)_validate(), but also
> restrict the functions to classic iptables hooks.
> 
> Changes in v3:
>   * clarify that upstream nft will not display such configuration properly and
>     that the output was generated with a patched nft tool
>   * remove example program from commit description and link to it instead
>   * no code changes otherwise
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   * restrict nft_(match/target)_validate() to classic iptables hooks
>   * rewrite example program to use unmodified libnftnl
> 
> Fixes: d0009effa886 ("netfilter: nf_tables: validate NFPROTO_* family")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zc1PfoWN38UuFJRI@calendula/T/#mc947262582c90fec044c7a3398cc92fac7afea72 [1]
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240220145509.53357-1-ignat@cloudflare.com/ [2]
> Reported-by: Jordan Griege <jgriege@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ignat Korchagin <ignat@cloudflare.com>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nft_compat.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
> index 1f9474fefe84..d3d11dede545 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
> @@ -359,10 +359,20 @@ static int nft_target_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>  
>  	if (ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV4 &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV6 &&
> +	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_INET &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_BRIDGE &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_ARP)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> +	ret = nft_chain_validate_hooks(ctx->chain,
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_FORWARD) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_POST_ROUTING));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	if (nft_is_base_chain(ctx->chain)) {
>  		const struct nft_base_chain *basechain =
>  						nft_base_chain(ctx->chain);
> @@ -610,10 +620,20 @@ static int nft_match_validate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
>  
>  	if (ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV4 &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_IPV6 &&
> +	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_INET &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_BRIDGE &&
>  	    ctx->family != NFPROTO_ARP)
>  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>  
> +	ret = nft_chain_validate_hooks(ctx->chain,
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_PRE_ROUTING) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_IN) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_FORWARD) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT) |
> +				       (1 << NF_INET_POST_ROUTING));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	if (nft_is_base_chain(ctx->chain)) {
>  		const struct nft_base_chain *basechain =
>  						nft_base_chain(ctx->chain);
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22 10:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-22 10:33 [PATCH v3] netfilter: nf_tables: allow NFPROTO_INET in nft_(match/target)_validate() Ignat Korchagin
2024-02-22 10:52 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2024-02-22 11:49   ` Ignat Korchagin
2024-02-22 12:29     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZdcnfnoEE10cV7gL@calendula \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=ignat@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=jgriege@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).