Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nftables documentation improvement?
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 22:03:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zf9DskY3QHAIBGLE@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zf6Y2s6eyrhlWLZz@nataraja>

Hi Harald,

On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 09:54:50AM +0100, Harald Welte wrote:
> Dear netfilter project,
> 
> In my recent interaction explaining nftables to some other users I am
> under the impression that there is likely some improvement possible to
> the nftables wiki.
> 
> The wiki is full of details about the individual expressions, actions,
> etc. - but I think what's lacking (or I couldn't find it) is some kind
> of conscise overall description of the terminology + the general
> high-level architecture of the ruleset.
> 
> You can find some description in the first two paragraphs of 
> https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Simple_rule_management
> but that doesn't define the terms used (action, expression, statement,
> ...)
> 
> You can find an overview of the terms used in
> https://wiki.nftables.org/wiki-nftables/index.php/Quick_reference-nftables_in_10_minutes
> [but then actually with imprecise language like "rule refers to an
> action to be configured within a chain." while a rule actually consists
> of matching expressions and an action"]
> 
> I'd be willing to try to write a proposed improvded text expressing what
> I have in mind.  I'd prefer to do that as some separate wiki page as a
> draft for you guys to review before deciding whether to use it in the
> main wiki pages.  I just didn't want to write it as unformatted
> plain-text here in e-mail and then later have to re-format in wiki
> syntax.

That's fine, I should have written that already myself, your help is
welcome on this.

> So in short: If anybody would be willing to add an account for me, I'd
> give it a shot and you can decide if you think what I'd consider an
> improvement is also one in your point of view.

Just sent you credentials in a private email.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-23 21:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-23  8:54 nftables documentation improvement? Harald Welte
2024-03-23 21:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2024-03-26 13:59   ` Harald Welte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zf9DskY3QHAIBGLE@calendula \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox