From: Quan Tian <tianquan23@gmail.com>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, tianquan23@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 09:06:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZfQPooVt0Ey+fIl9@dev01> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240314201602.5137-1-pablo@netfilter.org>
Hi Pablo,
On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 09:16:02PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Restore skipping transaction if table update does not modify flags.
>
> Fixes: 179d9ba5559a ("netfilter: nf_tables: fix table flag updates")
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> ---
> This restores:
>
> nft -f -<<EOF
> add table ip t { flags dormant ; }
> EOF
>
> nft -f -<<EOF
> add table ip t
> add chain ip t c1 { type filter hook input priority 1; }
> add table ip t
> add chain ip t c2 { type filter hook input priority 2; }
> EOF
>
> after c9bd26513b3a ("netfilter: nf_tables: disable toggling dormant
> table state more than once") which IMO is not the real issue.
>
> This provides an alternative fix for:
> [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix consistent table updates being rejected
The alternative fix definitely makes sense. But I thought "[PATCH nf]
netfilter: nf_tables: fix consistent table updates being rejected" also
fixes the case that two individual updates updating different flags in
a batch, for example:
* The 1st update adopts an orphan table, NFT_TABLE_F_OWNER and
__NFT_TABLE_F_WAS_ORPHAN were turned on.
* The 2nd update activates/inactivates it, trying to turn off/on
NFT_TABLE_F_DORMANT, which would be rejected currently if it only
checks if any flag is set in __NFT_TABLE_F_UPDATE, I thought it's
not the intention according to the code comments.
Thanks,
Quan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-15 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-14 20:16 [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: do not compare internal table flags on updates Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-03-15 9:06 ` Quan Tian [this message]
2024-03-20 16:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZfQPooVt0Ey+fIl9@dev01 \
--to=tianquan23@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).