netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] iptables: cleanup FIXME
@ 2024-05-23 14:50 Michael Estner
  2024-05-23 16:45 ` Phil Sutter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Estner @ 2024-05-23 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter-devel; +Cc: Michael Estner

Remove obsolet FIXME since struct ebt_entry has no flags var.
Update the debug output.

Signed-off-by: Michael Estner <michaelestner@web.de>
---
 iptables/nft-bridge.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/iptables/nft-bridge.c b/iptables/nft-bridge.c
index 922ce983..f5deaa93 100644
--- a/iptables/nft-bridge.c
+++ b/iptables/nft-bridge.c
@@ -373,9 +373,8 @@ static bool nft_bridge_is_same(const struct iptables_command_state *cs_a,
 	int i;

 	if (a->ethproto != b->ethproto ||
-	    /* FIXME: a->flags != b->flags || */
 	    a->invflags != b->invflags) {
-		DEBUGP("different proto/flags/invflags\n");
+		DEBUGP("different proto/invflags\n");
 		return false;
 	}

--
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] iptables: cleanup FIXME
  2024-05-23 14:50 [PATCH] iptables: cleanup FIXME Michael Estner
@ 2024-05-23 16:45 ` Phil Sutter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Phil Sutter @ 2024-05-23 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Estner; +Cc: netfilter-devel

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 04:50:58PM +0200, Michael Estner wrote:
> Remove obsolet FIXME since struct ebt_entry has no flags var.
> Update the debug output.

It never had, but there's bitmask and I wonder if it should compare
those values instead.

Cheers, Phil

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] iptables: cleanup FIXME
       [not found] <Zk9yrd8Ji1xAcblw>
@ 2024-05-24 13:24 ` Michael Estner
  2024-05-24 13:24   ` Michael Estner
  2024-05-26  9:50   ` Phil Sutter
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Estner @ 2024-05-24 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: phil; +Cc: netfilter-devel

I checked bitmask in the ebt_entry struct in iptables/xshared.h
Should be compared here since bitmask needs to be the first
field in the struct ebt_entry.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] iptables: cleanup FIXME
  2024-05-24 13:24 ` Michael Estner
@ 2024-05-24 13:24   ` Michael Estner
  2024-05-26  9:50   ` Phil Sutter
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Michael Estner @ 2024-05-24 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: phil; +Cc: netfilter-devel, Michael Estner

Rework FIXME since struct ebt_entry has no flags var.
Use variable bitmask instead.
Update the debug output.

Signed-off-by: Michael Estner <michaelestner@web.de>
---
 iptables/nft-bridge.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/iptables/nft-bridge.c b/iptables/nft-bridge.c
index 922ce983..f4a3c69a 100644
--- a/iptables/nft-bridge.c
+++ b/iptables/nft-bridge.c
@@ -373,9 +373,9 @@ static bool nft_bridge_is_same(const struct iptables_command_state *cs_a,
 	int i;

 	if (a->ethproto != b->ethproto ||
-	    /* FIXME: a->flags != b->flags || */
+	    a->bitmask != b->bitmask ||
 	    a->invflags != b->invflags) {
-		DEBUGP("different proto/flags/invflags\n");
+		DEBUGP("different proto/bitmask/invflags\n");
 		return false;
 	}

--
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] iptables: cleanup FIXME
  2024-05-24 13:24 ` Michael Estner
  2024-05-24 13:24   ` Michael Estner
@ 2024-05-26  9:50   ` Phil Sutter
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Phil Sutter @ 2024-05-26  9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michael Estner; +Cc: netfilter-devel

Hi Michael,

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 03:24:51PM +0200, Michael Estner wrote:
> I checked bitmask in the ebt_entry struct in iptables/xshared.h
> Should be compared here since bitmask needs to be the first
> field in the struct ebt_entry.

The reason why 'bitmask' has to be the first field is that in kernel
space, the first bit in it is used to distinguish list element types
between 'struct ebt_entries' and 'struct ebt_entry'. See
EBT_ENTRY_OR_ENTRIES define and the related comment in
include/uapi/linux/netfilter_bridge/ebtables.h for reference.

While it seems sensible to do, I wonder why things seem to work fine
even without it. Do we find a corner-case which makes it necessary to
compare 'bitmask'? Or the other way round, is there a case which breaks
if we do?

Cheers, Phil

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-05-26  9:50 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-05-23 14:50 [PATCH] iptables: cleanup FIXME Michael Estner
2024-05-23 16:45 ` Phil Sutter
     [not found] <Zk9yrd8Ji1xAcblw>
2024-05-24 13:24 ` Michael Estner
2024-05-24 13:24   ` Michael Estner
2024-05-26  9:50   ` Phil Sutter

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).