From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>, Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Fabio <pedretti.fabio@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [nf-next PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: xt_recent: Reduce size of struct recent_entry::nstamps
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 01:39:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Znymv6czZP4M4zuc@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZnyY-j4pqHjflOnb@orbyte.nwl.cc>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 12:40:58AM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 06:12:43PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > Hi Phil,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 05:16:40PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > There is no point in this change besides presenting its possibility
> > > separate from a follow-up patch extending the size of both 'index' and
> > > 'nstamps' fields.
> > >
> > > The value of 'nstamps' is initialized to 1 in recent_entry_init() and
> > > adjusted in recent_entry_update() to match that of 'index' if it becomes
> > > larger after being incremented. Since 'index' is of type u8, it will at
> > > max become 255 (and wrap to 0 afterwards). Therefore, 'nstamps' will
> > > also never exceed the value 255.
> >
> > Series LGTM.
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> > I'd suggest you collapse these two patches while keeping the
> > description above, because nstamps is shrinked here in 1/2 then it
> > gets back to original u16 in 2/2.
>
> ACK, that was the plan right from the start. :)
Thanks, I have to admit splitting the patch in two helped me
understand a lot better when reviewing.
> > Maybe something like:
>
> I composed a new note to add to the second patch. Please review and let
> me know if it's unclear or misleading.
LGTM, thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-26 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-14 15:16 [nf-next PATCH v2 0/2] netfilter: xt_recent: Allow for larger hitcount values Phil Sutter
2024-06-14 15:16 ` [nf-next PATCH v2 1/2] netfilter: xt_recent: Reduce size of struct recent_entry::nstamps Phil Sutter
2024-06-26 16:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-06-26 22:40 ` Phil Sutter
2024-06-26 23:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2024-06-27 0:06 ` Phil Sutter
2024-06-14 15:16 ` [nf-next PATCH v2 2/2] netfilter: xt_recent: Lift restrictions on max hitcount value Phil Sutter
2024-06-14 15:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2024-06-14 15:58 ` Fabio Pedretti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Znymv6czZP4M4zuc@calendula \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pedretti.fabio@gmail.com \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox