From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej1-f74.google.com (mail-ej1-f74.google.com [209.85.218.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64B51885A6 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 09:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.74 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725962015; cv=none; b=kk/+C4AhL0JgZFrnJ7Fc6ISksI8q9v5zLBFenLdwrW4kFPkgWlJMq9C61FB0AnykC8g3XS2tfLiznIPNZ3N2gUrQHi0y9Yrdj64tKLUYNhrV9rjgeN5bAu2VaOTDqDGSnKhQ+p0pGejSaQP8/iuOj4E6RosubWJIX3fMwNLsySQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725962015; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bUjKo2hKjo47ALYGkcpnrzn7VI8TDc7sUV14SFfR5BY=; h=Date:In-Reply-To:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:From: To:Cc:Content-Type; b=X5abr/3UOUulFG87y/xyIbbjYPkov0C084hrNZY/KoTz5H1z7KIugbX9ChGD38xAWbu7QqEXFJmUvsUI+eX/jVdAi5Cj+r6Ea9JtA5GjTJqtmij/zcyZSg9ZperAbADUOCHegWJnCVIE2xlKyQXwBlJx4NHvIVCfk1rUHyMEzqY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--gnoack.bounces.google.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b=fLkWhyqZ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.218.74 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=flex--gnoack.bounces.google.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="fLkWhyqZ" Received: by mail-ej1-f74.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a8d1a00e0beso380277866b.0 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 02:53:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1725962012; x=1726566812; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=QLwzZqGyb/MrVPN3DxT7ybP0Dg2vrqdUnFlphaKFoAA=; b=fLkWhyqZPrUn2RTPMIxVuvgazuhVpKBuHBjy+UKi1CMZ75bnyjKMOhznOTsf04RFCO xWpAdutKoMQDwJfwZHSl98o+T9vZm7TKMt9VVPkao++EmLebUaZcZ+1ZmeYgZovNNLmT 2Knm+DtCGLmc2uMwMq1aWqTrmPSzd4jTGArnkLGV2S1A3oX6+u2BLlrZgjnXXQ1hPKwP SPUlRbTeWaHzXuL5E6KU/1Tn+RCPgd2ccyjpxZtWhy4WzRCRkmK8P0e3mLAmyIADnrX2 2FpLF3lwrQNvkavEewEwRDtmihK6HWshWW+2FhbJGfw769A3i3G1mY3LTQoeHcOg2wLu rkag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1725962012; x=1726566812; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QLwzZqGyb/MrVPN3DxT7ybP0Dg2vrqdUnFlphaKFoAA=; b=p/wzlXpw3WgrgAZ1Wl+Ma1MO9aI1vykK+OcPvSHWrXspkm+7T3wex0SFS7eE6CKHdx +IarRdygKSbzIFD2KYJC+QglaLqRlpXiZM3uFlHgXJu+eD+LKntFr+7yZwX4/bMvTH6X rGfckMwSdiy0TLhzwuuYQgmA0/ETNDoqpp9fPI/9sV7vdN8aMkjEBcRV1E4vFHKdA5Jo /euoguA0SifAeNBSVJ9Yz/gs3SRX7dqrdszKvfp4t/XqCyePrk06yYvfT+vbYgIafOMP bJu4Q3gL3+8Vh5wSpXXFRU5ou0nTDdYlccRhMwDupE0UJWGMRubHbGfdN9NWtr2D1e/u 58KA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWbIcvsddcxcBlBnLsh6qJQZE01RT34D1ZnSGDmTqutw4Vcp24/6n9GPeTASFO+WORSv89RDn+DIVhrJe4kfug=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyKndFQT3C+n/mkop4aeFLoV3YGb9CMrjTS/xJ+JlOiUIbGqI4j TAuHhQvz4668Ljjd1XS4fHseMnEUa1XztXx8TghY6Y6dp6CsIRwAAue6DvKr32mQONsp7q7ZUxO I4Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEKRkuwKZ+CzVsiEkxduxS73xjFyBD2cngHBnHjRzLoQtzVHwrcWcBID3PvyDTBlYs+V00WXsliOxM= X-Received: from swim.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:31:98fb:c0a8:1605]) (user=gnoack job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:906:3798:b0:a8a:802a:bfcc with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a8ffaec4543mr8266b.7.1725962011800; Tue, 10 Sep 2024 02:53:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 11:53:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20240904104824.1844082-5-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20240904104824.1844082-1-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> <20240904104824.1844082-5-ivanov.mikhail1@huawei-partners.com> Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/19] selftests/landlock: Test adding a rule with each supported access From: "=?utf-8?Q?G=C3=BCnther?= Noack" To: Mikhail Ivanov Cc: mic@digikod.net, willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com, gnoack3000@gmail.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, yusongping@huawei.com, artem.kuzin@huawei.com, konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 06:48:09PM +0800, Mikhail Ivanov wrote: > Add test that checks the possibility of adding rule of > `LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET` type with all possible access rights. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Mikhail Ivanov > --- > Changes since v2: > * Replaces EXPECT_EQ with ASSERT_EQ for close(). > * Refactors commit message and title. >=20 > Changes since v1: > * Formats code with clang-format. > * Refactors commit message. > --- > .../testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+) >=20 > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c b/tools/testi= ng/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c > index 63bb269c9d07..cb23efd3ccc9 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/socket_test.c > @@ -16,6 +16,9 @@ > =20 > #include "common.h" > =20 > +#define ACCESS_LAST LANDLOCK_ACCESS_SOCKET_CREATE > +#define ACCESS_ALL LANDLOCK_ACCESS_SOCKET_CREATE > + > struct protocol_variant { > int family; > int type; > @@ -294,4 +297,32 @@ TEST_F(protocol, create) > EXPECT_EQ(EACCES, test_socket_variant(&self->prot)); > } > =20 > +TEST_F(protocol, socket_access_rights) > +{ > + const struct landlock_ruleset_attr ruleset_attr =3D { > + .handled_access_socket =3D ACCESS_ALL, > + }; > + struct landlock_socket_attr protocol =3D { > + .family =3D self->prot.family, > + .type =3D self->prot.type, > + }; > + int ruleset_fd; > + __u64 access; > + > + ruleset_fd =3D > + landlock_create_ruleset(&ruleset_attr, sizeof(ruleset_attr), 0); > + ASSERT_LE(0, ruleset_fd); > + > + for (access =3D 1; access <=3D ACCESS_LAST; access <<=3D 1) { > + protocol.allowed_access =3D access; > + EXPECT_EQ(0, landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_SOCKET, > + &protocol, 0)) > + { > + TH_LOG("Failed to add rule with access 0x%llx: %s", > + access, strerror(errno)); > + } > + } > + ASSERT_EQ(0, close(ruleset_fd)); > +} > + > TEST_HARNESS_MAIN > --=20 > 2.34.1 >=20 Reviewed-by: G=C3=BCnther Noack