netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Eric Garver <e@erig.me>
Subject: Re: [nf-next PATCH v4 13/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Handle NETDEV_CHANGENAME events
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2024 12:48:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zu_18Az4-Boh9aCv@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240922073224.GA32587@breakpoint.cc>

On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 09:32:24AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> > For the sake of simplicity, treat them like consecutive NETDEV_REGISTER
> > and NETDEV_UNREGISTER events. If the new name matches a hook spec and
> > registration fails, escalate the error and keep things as they are.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
> > ---
> > Changes since v3:
> > - Register first and handle errors to avoid having unregistered the
> >   device but registration fails.
> > ---
> >  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c    | 5 +++++
> >  net/netfilter/nft_chain_filter.c | 5 +++++
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> > index 2684990dd3dc..4d40c1905735 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> > @@ -9371,6 +9371,11 @@ static int nf_tables_flowtable_event(struct notifier_block *this,
> >  	struct nft_table *table;
> >  	struct net *net;
> >  
> > +	if (event == NETDEV_CHANGENAME) {
> > +		if (nf_tables_flowtable_event(this, NETDEV_REGISTER, ptr))
> > +			return NOTIFY_BAD;
> > +		event = NETDEV_UNREGISTER;
> > +	}
> 
> Consider flowtable that should claim devices "pv*".
> You get CHANGENAME, device name is, say, pv5.
> 
> Device name is registered in nf_tables_flowtable_event().
> Then, event is set to UNREGISTER.
> 
> AFAICS this may unreg the device again immediately, as unreg part
> only compares device pointer and we can't be sure the device was
> part of any flowtable when CHANGENAME was triggered.
> 
> So I think nf_tables_flowtable_event() must handle CHANGENAME
> directly, first check if any flowtable holds the device at this time,
> then check if we need to register it with a new name, and do unreg
> only if it was previously part of any flowtable.
> 
> Same logic needed for netdev chains.
> 
> Does that make sense?

Oh, you're right: Registering the device again (with new name) then
searching *all* flowtables for the device and unregistering it will
undo the previous registration, too! This obviously needs proper
testing, too.

Thanks, Phil

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-22 10:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-20 20:23 [nf-next PATCH v4 00/16] Dynamic hook interface binding Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 01/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Flowtable hook's pf value never varies Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 02/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Store user-defined hook ifname Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 03/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Use stored ifname in netdev hook dumps Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 04/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Compare netdev hooks based on stored name Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 05/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Tolerate chains with no remaining hooks Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 06/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce functions freeing nft_hook objects Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 07/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce nft_hook_find_ops() Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 08/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Introduce nft_register_flowtable_ops() Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 09/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Drop __nft_unregister_flowtable_net_hooks() Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 10/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Have a list of nf_hook_ops in nft_hook Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 11/16] netfilter: nf_tables: chain: Respect NETDEV_REGISTER events Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 12/16] netfilter: nf_tables: flowtable: " Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 13/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Handle NETDEV_CHANGENAME events Phil Sutter
2024-09-22  7:32   ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-22 10:48     ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 14/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Support wildcard netdev hook specs Phil Sutter
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 15/16] netfilter: nf_tables: Add notications for hook changes Phil Sutter
2024-09-21  9:10   ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-25 17:25     ` Phil Sutter
2024-09-25 17:51       ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-25 18:16         ` Phil Sutter
2024-09-25 18:17           ` Florian Westphal
2024-09-20 20:23 ` [nf-next PATCH v4 16/16] selftests: netfilter: Torture nftables netdev hooks Phil Sutter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zu_18Az4-Boh9aCv@orbyte.nwl.cc \
    --to=phil@nwl.cc \
    --cc=e@erig.me \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).