From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org (ganesha.gnumonks.org [213.95.27.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9E9C199956; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.27.120 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726740499; cv=none; b=FAwv4CDLFzxoMObhOMNNR4GVB2CpSIrHY9GaW+nAfSJ99EfQShrlLbdbRrPpy/42DPUsrssrxA1+SxMcWmYn9X06TRTi60EItRTV1/QfEE3kfWzXqX/y8/qtvha7z2oWN7Unh1p2i8DXWnmA4itDKSNl+x8/Oiz952yNWn0gkVk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726740499; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iQHq5X10ZfpzHxsR132EfJBHxX3P8U3sauM6BcLU8Ko=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JyTx6CM2Y48jtVesnTWN2qmvy+Pwtnft0nX6b7wSeGsXNWBFbtsrbF/6FjUk1r5zbJGCX70MKgQcETVSrq0r1Y0n0MZwbmcwk0SIYnEqUCXJ/MFo5NaPpP5tqPi97kwZnP0jYy0gLm+CXpyo3tVJZSTt/Ifs1B4v862ifvT+46Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnumonks.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.95.27.120 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnumonks.org Received: from [78.30.37.63] (port=48768 helo=gnumonks.org) by ganesha.gnumonks.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1srE52-003A0F-GJ; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:08:10 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 12:08:07 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Breno Leitao Cc: fw@strlen.de, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, rbc@meta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v5 0/2] netfilter: Make IP_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY selectable Message-ID: References: <20240909084620.3155679-1-leitao@debian.org> <20240919-refreshing-grinning-leopard-8f8ca7@leitao> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240919-refreshing-grinning-leopard-8f8ca7@leitao> X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:31:12AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > Hello Pablo, > > On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 01:13:29PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 01:46:17AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > These two patches make IP_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY and IP6_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY > > > Kconfigs user selectable, avoiding creating an extra dependency by > > > enabling some other config that would select IP{6}_NF_IPTABLES_LEGACY. > > > > This needs a v6. There is also: > > > > BRIDGE_NF_EBTABLES_LEGACY > > > > We have more copy and paste in the bridge. > > > > Would you submit a single patch covering this too? > > Sure, I am more than happy to work on this one and also on > IP_NF_ARPTABLES. > > Would you like a v6 with all the four changes, or, two extra patches and > keep this thread ready for merge? One single patch is fine, thanks. > PS: I am in LPC and in Kernel Recipes next week, I might not be able to > do it until next week. > > Thanks