From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: "Pablo Neira Ayuso" <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>,
Laura Garcia Liebana <nevola@gmail.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH nf-next v4 1/5] net: sched: Micro-optimize egress handling
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 09:47:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a2a8af1622dff2bfd51d446aa8da2c1d2f6f543c.1611304190.git.lukas@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1611304190.git.lukas@wunner.de>
sch_handle_egress() returns either the skb or NULL to signal to its
caller __dev_queue_xmit() whether a packet should continue to be
processed.
The skb is always non-NULL, otherwise __dev_queue_xmit() would hit a
NULL pointer deref right at its top.
But the compiler doesn't know that. So if sch_handle_egress() signals
success by returning the skb, the "if (!skb) goto out;" statement
results in a gratuitous NULL pointer check in the Assembler output.
Avoid by telling the compiler that __dev_queue_xmit() is never passed a
NULL skb. This also eliminates another gratuitous NULL pointer check in
__dev_queue_xmit()
qdisc_pkt_len_init()
skb_header_pointer()
__skb_header_pointer()
The speedup is barely measurable:
Before: 1877 1875 1878 1874 1882 1873 Mb/sec
After: 1877 1877 1880 1883 1888 1886 Mb/sec
However we're about to add a netfilter egress hook to __dev_queue_xmit()
and without the micro-optimization, it will result in a performance
degradation which is indeed measurable:
With netfilter hook: 1853 1852 1850 1848 1849 1851 Mb/sec
With netfilter hook + micro-optim: 1874 1877 1881 1875 1876 1876 Mb/sec
The performance degradation is caused by a JNE instruction ("if (skb)")
being flipped to a JE instruction ("if (!skb)") once the netfilter hook
is added. The micro-optimization removes the test and jump instructions
altogether.
Measurements were performed on a Core i7-3615QM. Reproducer:
ip link add dev foo type dummy
ip link set dev foo up
tc qdisc add dev foo clsact
tc filter add dev foo egress bpf da bytecode '1,6 0 0 0,'
modprobe pktgen
echo "add_device foo" > /proc/net/pktgen/kpktgend_3
samples/pktgen/pktgen_bench_xmit_mode_queue_xmit.sh -i foo -n 400000000 -m "11:11:11:11:11:11" -d 1.1.1.1
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
---
net/core/dev.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 7afbb642e203..4c16b9932823 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4072,6 +4072,7 @@ struct netdev_queue *netdev_core_pick_tx(struct net_device *dev,
* the BH enable code must have IRQs enabled so that it will not deadlock.
* --BLG
*/
+__attribute__((nonnull(1)))
static int __dev_queue_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *sb_dev)
{
struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
--
2.29.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-22 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-22 8:47 [PATCH nf-next v4 0/5] Netfilter egress hook Lukas Wunner
2021-01-22 8:47 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2021-01-22 9:40 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 1/5] net: sched: Micro-optimize egress handling Eric Dumazet
2021-01-24 10:33 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-01-25 19:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-26 8:58 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-01-30 16:00 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-01-24 3:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-01-24 10:46 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-01-22 8:47 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 2/5] netfilter: Rename ingress hook include file Lukas Wunner
2021-01-22 8:47 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 3/5] netfilter: Generalize " Lukas Wunner
2021-01-22 8:47 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 4/5] netfilter: Introduce egress hook Lukas Wunner
2021-01-26 19:13 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-09-11 21:26 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-09-15 9:45 ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-01-22 8:47 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 5/5] af_packet: " Lukas Wunner
2021-01-22 16:13 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-01-24 11:14 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-01-24 16:18 ` Willem de Bruijn
2021-01-30 16:26 ` Lukas Wunner
2021-01-30 16:58 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a2a8af1622dff2bfd51d446aa8da2c1d2f6f543c.1611304190.git.lukas@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nevola@gmail.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).