From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF301C433E0 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5272A64E68 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229916AbhBOHXH (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 02:23:07 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47196 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229652AbhBOHXF (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 02:23:05 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.kfki.hu (smtp-out.kfki.hu [IPv6:2001:738:5001::45]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 944DCC061574; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 23:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.kfki.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70B76740155; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:21:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smtp0.kfki.hu Received: from smtp0.kfki.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp0.kfki.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:21:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from blackhole.kfki.hu (blackhole.szhk.kfki.hu [148.6.240.2]) by smtp0.kfki.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ADA6740151; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:21:09 +0100 (CET) Received: by blackhole.kfki.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 725A7340D5D; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:21:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blackhole.kfki.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA3A340D5C; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:21:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:21:09 +0100 (CET) From: Jozsef Kadlecsik To: Reindl Harald cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] netfilter: xt_recent: Fix attempt to update deleted entry In-Reply-To: <303fdd83-a324-5d0c-b45e-9584ea0c9cd5@thelounge.net> Message-ID: References: <20210205001727.2125-1-pablo@netfilter.org> <20210205001727.2125-2-pablo@netfilter.org> <69957353-7fe0-9faa-4ddd-1ac44d5386a5@thelounge.net> <3018f068-62b1-6dae-2dde-39d1a62fbcb2@thelounge.net> <303fdd83-a324-5d0c-b45e-9584ea0c9cd5@thelounge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > why is that still not part of 5.10.14 given how old that issue is > > > > > > https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.10.14 > > > > Probably we missed the window when patches were accepted for the new > > release. That's all > > probably something is broken in the whole process given that 5.10.15 still > don't contain the fix while i am tired of a new "stable release" every few > days and 5.10.x like every LTS release in the past few years has a peak of it > > https://cdn.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/ChangeLog-5.10.15 The process is a multi-step one: netfilter patches are sent for reviewing/accepting/rejecting to the net maintaners, and after that they send the patches to the kernel source maintainers. A single patch is rarely picked out to handle differently. The patch has entered the queue for the stable trees. Best regards, Jozsef - E-mail : kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu, kadlecsik.jozsef@wigner.hu PGP key : https://wigner.hu/~kadlec/pgp_public_key.txt Address : Wigner Research Centre for Physics H-1525 Budapest 114, POB. 49, Hungary