netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: lvxiafei <xiafei_xupt@163.com>,
	coreteam@netfilter.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
	horms@kernel.org, kadlec@netfilter.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lvxiafei@sensetime.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6] netfilter: netns nf_conntrack: per-netns net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_max sysctl
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 21:32:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aC97x6CHFleb54i0@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aC96AHaQX9WVtln5@calendula>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > -        to nf_conntrack_buckets by default.
> > -        Note that connection tracking entries are added to the table twice -- once
> > -        for the original direction and once for the reply direction (i.e., with
> > -        the reversed address). This means that with default settings a maxed-out
> > -        table will have a average hash chain length of 2, not 1.
> > +    - 0 - disabled (unlimited)
> 
> unlimited is too much, and the number of buckets is also global, how
> does this work?

Its an historic wart going back to ip_conntrack - it was never the
default but you could disable any and all limits even in the original
version.

Wether its time to disallow 0 is a different topic and not related to this patch.

I would argue: "yes", disallow 0 -- users can still set INT_MAX if they
 want and that should provide enough rope to strangle yourself.

> > +    The limit of other netns cannot be greater than init_net netns.
> > +    +----------------+-------------+----------------+
> > +    | init_net netns | other netns | limit behavior |
> > +    +----------------+-------------+----------------+
> > +    | 0              | 0           | unlimited      |
> > +    +----------------+-------------+----------------+
> > +    | 0              | not 0       | other          |
> > +    +----------------+-------------+----------------+
> > +    | not 0          | 0           | init_net       |
> > +    +----------------+-------------+----------------+
> > +    | not 0          | not 0       | min            |
> > +    +----------------+-------------+----------------+

I think this is fine, it doesn't really change things from init_net
point of view.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-22 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07  9:50 [PATCH] netfilter: netns nf_conntrack: per-netns net.netfilter.nf_conntrack_max sysctl lvxiafei
2025-04-07 10:13 ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-07 10:56   ` Jan Engelhardt
2025-04-08  8:27     ` lvxiafei
2025-04-08  8:38     ` lvxiafei
2025-04-08  8:17   ` lvxiafei
2025-04-08  9:03 ` [PATCH V2] " lvxiafei
2025-04-08  9:58   ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-08 12:39     ` lvxiafei
2025-04-08 13:28       ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-09  4:14         ` lvxiafei
2025-04-09  4:25 ` [PATCH V3] " lvxiafei
2025-04-09  7:20   ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-09  9:13     ` lvxiafei
2025-04-09  9:42       ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-10 10:02         ` lvxiafei
2025-04-10 10:53           ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-10 13:05         ` lvxiafei
2025-04-10 13:17           ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-10 14:16             ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-11  4:09               ` lvxiafei
2025-04-12 14:37 ` [PATCH V4] " lvxiafei
2025-04-12 17:26 ` [PATCH V5] " lvxiafei
2025-04-12 17:30   ` lvxiafei
2025-04-12 21:16   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-04-13  1:14     ` lvxiafei
2025-04-13  9:07   ` Florian Westphal
2025-04-14  3:04     ` lvxiafei
2025-04-15  9:08 ` [PATCH V6] " lvxiafei
2025-04-27  8:14   ` lvxiafei
2025-04-28  9:40     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-22 19:24   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-22 19:32     ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-05-22 19:58       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-05-23  9:21         ` lvxiafei
2025-10-14 13:54           ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aC97x6CHFleb54i0@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvxiafei@sensetime.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=xiafei_xupt@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).