netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft] parser_bison: fix memory leak when parsing flowtable hook declaration
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 11:44:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIIAbqru_zAWLtFv@calendula> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250723150021.10811-1-fw@strlen.de>

On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 05:00:11PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> When the hook location is invalid we error out but we do leak both
> the priority expression and the flowtable name.  Example:
> 
> valgrind --leak-check=full nft -f flowtable-parser-err-memleak
> [..] Error: unknown chain hook
> hook enoent priority filter + 10
>      ^^^^^^
> [..]
> 2 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 1 of 3
>    at: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:446)
>    by: strdup (in libc.so.6)
>    by: xstrdup (in libnftables.so.1.1.0)
>    by: nft_lex (in libnftables.so.1.1.0)
>    by: nft_parse (in libnftables.so.1.1.0)
>    by: __nft_run_cmd_from_filename (in libnftables.so.1.1.0)
>    by: nft_run_cmd_from_filename (in libnftables.so.1.1.0)
> 
> First two reports are due to the priority expression: this needs to call
> expr_free().  Third report is due to the flowtable name, the destructor
> was missing so add one.
> 
> After fix:
> All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>

Reviewed-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>

Thanks

      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-24  9:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <netfilter-devel>
2019-04-30 12:53 ` [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: fix oops during rule dump Florian Westphal
2019-05-01  3:54   ` Taehee Yoo
2019-05-20 19:21   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2022-09-06 15:20 ` [PATCH nf-next 0/2] netfilter: nat: avoid long-running loops Florian Westphal
2022-09-06 15:20   ` [PATCH nf-next 1/2] netfilter: nat: move repetitive nat port reserve loop to a helper Florian Westphal
2022-09-06 15:20   ` [PATCH nf-next 2/2] netfilter: nat: avoid long-running port range loop Florian Westphal
2023-10-06  9:27 ` [PATCH nf-next] netfilter: conntrack: simplify nf_conntrack_alter_reply Florian Westphal
2025-07-23 15:00 ` [PATCH nft] parser_bison: fix memory leak when parsing flowtable hook declaration Florian Westphal
2025-07-24  9:44   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aIIAbqru_zAWLtFv@calendula \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).