From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.netfilter.org (mail.netfilter.org [217.70.190.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 718542D4B71 for ; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 12:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753361277; cv=none; b=VKC5b+4uW/GDpzY5PrVxlyBUb3m/JgSi0XtTc6UXURXMuODMYF3rI0REcq0ENexU0Y+5wrmA3yCGJaH4pQfbNyUfUa/BFbWVzYwC5g3dMVpNBKvZ8F6eM3FUe33+SzwFoyvN2Zp0AqMT9Gx9467LI0t/GWdnfa8It9Z99sC63RE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753361277; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Q65jpNemx1aPbyIJLEsFF9Mk8sT5+Rq8h9lKHZzKpKQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=uahN4LUgpVG6metsrLLe9QpLHeoHRE9xNaI71Gsb1N9qpD4LMaHiry+U/OiXaWLKUy5WnK1YE7YZxQGNHG9hg28dalKpcZlzAY4m+wZCbS3CzfCtCMN59SgBdjF2v+QtGe2Mn98Bn0yf/E3FkjKWcErlgCMp9m+2mXvsxrxOXDU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=feOO13FK; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b=feOO13FK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.190.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netfilter.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="feOO13FK"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netfilter.org header.i=@netfilter.org header.b="feOO13FK" Received: by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix, from userid 109) id C79496026D; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:47:53 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1753361273; bh=/aDU1A0ZcnA3HhDWcE2E7hBZwwJ3ashTEJmSPnu91g0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=feOO13FKFpKluXgPQumISpnunh1AWCaA9sk5JW/oE5JGMT2oTyMOerJfnGmUwuUsp 6iqKeKxFjdymqpzj2YMCPfaC1KKwrjJD5doPZpKjPJlz5NzvBNjBlm7R26AFeTzqYd f+7hJYqYZQmX2JYiiK9zmBU0pHKcZUYnzsbN3nnD9O0Hx9OK1sNJrJbUX3T6aOSmhn 270oBpeSwHpXPXFGL2EUgIPgmwoBkLggupzwahhYTtvUzWcgUojQw81i4VjrQIuFqG 2eJSXn01+UkV0bHU+Q53yJZmYDJxKB9ui9H87XcGUVBb9caZAerYlYTu7E6tirhdVe qPdr3PADH3s2g== X-Spam-Level: Received: from netfilter.org (mail-agni [217.70.190.124]) by mail.netfilter.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D48FC60265; Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:47:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netfilter.org; s=2025; t=1753361273; bh=/aDU1A0ZcnA3HhDWcE2E7hBZwwJ3ashTEJmSPnu91g0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=feOO13FKFpKluXgPQumISpnunh1AWCaA9sk5JW/oE5JGMT2oTyMOerJfnGmUwuUsp 6iqKeKxFjdymqpzj2YMCPfaC1KKwrjJD5doPZpKjPJlz5NzvBNjBlm7R26AFeTzqYd f+7hJYqYZQmX2JYiiK9zmBU0pHKcZUYnzsbN3nnD9O0Hx9OK1sNJrJbUX3T6aOSmhn 270oBpeSwHpXPXFGL2EUgIPgmwoBkLggupzwahhYTtvUzWcgUojQw81i4VjrQIuFqG 2eJSXn01+UkV0bHU+Q53yJZmYDJxKB9ui9H87XcGUVBb9caZAerYlYTu7E6tirhdVe qPdr3PADH3s2g== Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 14:47:49 +0200 From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Florian Westphal Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v2 0/5] netfilter: nft_set updates Message-ID: References: <20250709170521.11778-1-fw@strlen.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 02:20:45PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote: > Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > > The fourth patch is the main change, it removes the control-plane > > > only C implementation of the pipapo lookup algorithm. > > > > > > The last patch allows the scratch maps to be backed by vmalloc. > > > > This clashes with: > > > > netfilter: nft_set_pipapo: Use nested-BH locking for nft_pipapo_scratch > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/list/?series=463248 > > > > It seems you and Sebastian have been working on the same area at the > > same time. > > > > Do you have a preference on how to proceed with this clash? > > If the clash is only in last patch, then how about this: > You apply the first few patches plus Sebastians work, push this out > (main or testing branch is fine too) and I will rebase + resend? Testing branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netfilter/nf-next.git/log/?h=testing I still have to make another pass on patchwork, regarding your work, there is one series of you to avoid the GFP_KERNEL allocation I would like to review. > Or, we can defer to 6.18, your call.