From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Yi Chen <yiche@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [nft PATCH] fib: Fix for existence check on Big Endian
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 00:48:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMCuzr9SaA--RG3f@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aMCdSDWhxCJM_kjY@calendula>
Hi Pablo,
On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 11:34:00PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2025 at 10:49:48PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Adjust the expression size to 1B so cmp expression value is correct.
> > Without this, the rule 'fib saddr . iif check exists' generates
> > following byte code on BE:
> >
> > | [ fib saddr . iif oif present => reg 1 ]
> > | [ cmp eq reg 1 0x00000001 ]
> >
> > Though with NFTA_FIB_F_PRESENT flag set, nft_fib.ko writes to the first
> > byte of reg 1 only (using nft_reg_store8()). With this patch in place,
> > byte code is correct:
> >
> > | [ fib saddr . iif oif present => reg 1 ]
> > | [ cmp eq reg 1 0x01000000 ]
>
> Is this a generic issue of boolean that is using 1 bit?
>
> const struct datatype boolean_type = {
> .type = TYPE_BOOLEAN,
> .name = "boolean",
> .desc = "boolean type",
> .size = 1,
Maybe, yes: I compared fib existence checks to exthdr ones in order to
find the bug. With exthdr, we know in parser already that it is an
existence check (see exthdr_exists_expr rule in parser_bison.y). If so,
exthdr expression is allocated with type 1 which is (assumed to be) the
NEXTHDR field in all extension headers. This field has
inet_protocol_type, which is size 8b.
Via expr_ctx::len, RHS will then be adjusted to 8b size (see 'expr->len =
masklen' in expr_evaluate_integer()).
IIRC, LHS defines the RHS size in relationals. I am not sure if we may
sanely reverse this rule if RHS is a boolean_type.
Cheers, Phil
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 20:49 [nft PATCH] fib: Fix for existence check on Big Endian Phil Sutter
2025-09-09 21:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-09-09 22:48 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2025-09-11 8:14 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-09-11 10:19 ` Phil Sutter
2025-09-11 14:20 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-09-11 16:17 ` Phil Sutter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMCuzr9SaA--RG3f@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=yiche@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).