netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nft v2] support for afl++ (american fuzzy lop++) fuzzer
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 16:24:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPZGOudKuDa5HMmS@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2686aa3-adc4-4684-9442-ab4ad9654c69@suse.de>

Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de> wrote:
> On 10/19/25 4:17 PM, Florian Westphal wrote:
> >> In addition I noticed that when a kernel splat happens the ruleset that
> >> triggered it isn't saved anywhere, it would be nice to save them so we have
> >> a reproducer right away.
> > 
> > I had such code but removed it for this version.
> > 
> > I can send a followup patch to re-add it but I think that it is better
> > for kernel fuzzing to extend knft acordingly, as nft is restricted by
> > the input grammar wrt. the nonsense that it can create.
> > 
> 
> That is fine for me, I still have pending to try knft which I might do 
> this week if I have time. If we do not want to save which ruleset 
> generated the kernel splat I would drop netlink-rw mode completely..

Hmmm.... I'm not sure on this.  It would be a bit of a silly limitation.
Its not like -rw adds a huge chunk of code.

The store code wasn't too bad, back then I added some scripting for
allow to e.g. call nft flush ruleset periodically and that was more code
than strictly needed for pure nft (-ro mode) fuzzing.

> Yes, it seems we found the same issue. I do not have a solution on the 
> control plane although I was about to send this patch for data plane.
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c
> index 6557a4018c09..ddc4943d082c 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c
> @@ -251,10 +251,10 @@ nft_do_chain(struct nft_pktinfo *pkt, void *priv)
>   {
>          const struct nft_chain *chain = priv, *basechain = chain;
>          const struct net *net = nft_net(pkt);
> +       unsigned int stackptr = 0, jumps = 0;
>          const struct nft_expr *expr, *last;
>          const struct nft_rule_dp *rule;
>          struct nft_regs regs;
> -       unsigned int stackptr = 0;
>          struct nft_jumpstack jumpstack[NFT_JUMP_STACK_SIZE];
>          bool genbit = READ_ONCE(net->nft.gencursor);
>          struct nft_rule_blob *blob;
> @@ -314,6 +314,9 @@ nft_do_chain(struct nft_pktinfo *pkt, void *priv)
> 
>          switch (regs.verdict.code) {
>          case NFT_JUMP:
> +               jumps++;
> +               if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jumps > 256))
> +                       return NF_DROP;
>                  if (WARN_ON_ONCE(stackptr >= NFT_JUMP_STACK_SIZE))
>                          return NF_DROP;
>                  jumpstack[stackptr].rule = nft_rule_next(rule);
> 
> Currently with enough jumps chained together and traffic generated, CPU 
> can get stuck on nft_do_chain() triggering a kernel splat. If there is a 
> solution on data plane it would be much better than this of course.

There is this patch:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netfilter-devel/patch/20250728040315.1014454-1-brady.1345@gmail.com/

I planned to push it upstream in this merge window.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-20 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-17 11:51 [PATCH nft v2] support for afl++ (american fuzzy lop++) fuzzer Florian Westphal
2025-10-19  9:34 ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2025-10-19 14:17   ` Florian Westphal
2025-10-20 14:11     ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2025-10-20 14:24       ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2025-10-20 15:23         ` Fernando Fernandez Mancera
2025-10-20 18:35           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-10-20 19:07             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-10-20 21:48               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-10-20 22:20                 ` Florian Westphal
2025-10-20 22:24                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2025-10-20 22:46                     ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aPZGOudKuDa5HMmS@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=fmancera@suse.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).