From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc [91.216.245.30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0786C28640B for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 15:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.216.245.30 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773157234; cv=none; b=PiEspxq4IwpcHB5mABoEiNNZ7QMa954186r0ZSVs8EKu0yTwIK+fx11++Jj2tUtC4FKCa2Ii50LA8F9d9jeNCuSE25hLIY5fX83sIXJacwzn7GXV4D++osvFST9vTjgQaaVzcGtg6fQwNrOmKEo5Jye1e/zlIs7/ZPtDwpSY4mc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773157234; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3Gqwj8ROl4IwoEhT3Nbs7D2dB2rXE+QoF6TP2IPtC4o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=IKlT4HqjQfM5hJShSYzw+mYHkP4uVq8UwaJVu6MczcpcqLkC0h3nruUQJlsoYeajcclsKRdwGMonmgFqn3vGD2lXGGsKK5FAAZJ+gHIlRqKZ3WlSJE2Zmp75yJv7cuKceQntj3DZA0R95DzIR3SanQRUMnC8FYtR64gmLxsCZgY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=strlen.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=strlen.de; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.216.245.30 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=strlen.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=strlen.de Received: by Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc (Postfix, from userid 1003) id D219060516; Tue, 10 Mar 2026 16:40:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2026 16:40:26 +0100 From: Florian Westphal To: Eric Woudstra Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 nf-next 5/5] netfilter: nft_chain_filter: Add bridge double vlan and pppoe Message-ID: References: <20260224065307.120768-1-ericwouds@gmail.com> <20260224065307.120768-6-ericwouds@gmail.com> <76b3546a-37c5-4dab-9074-4df0cbe48524@gmail.com> <58cc080e-1e55-4a51-8c3c-16d6b87794b2@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58cc080e-1e55-4a51-8c3c-16d6b87794b2@gmail.com> Eric Woudstra wrote: > For me, most is known, as it is probably not very different from other > places using patchwork. > > What was new and unclear were the AI generated reviews, and what is > expected in response of them. Ok. Basically they should be treated like any other review/comment. netdev maintainers do pre-filter the AI reviews, to avoid garbage from hitting list. In case the AI review is nonsense, just say so. Same for reviews that might make sense but enter bikeshed territory, you can always push back, no need to fix up everything. Just like with human requests [ albeit, if maintainer tells to 'do x', its a bit harder to push back of course 8-) ]