* [PATCH nf] nf_tables: nft_dynset: fix possible stateful expression memleak in error path
@ 2026-03-12 10:11 Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-12 11:02 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2026-03-12 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel; +Cc: fw
If cloning the second stateful expression in the element via GFP_ATOMIC
fails, then the first stateful expression remains in place without being
released.
unreferenced object (percpu) 0x607b97e9cab8 (size 16):
comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294931867
hex dump (first 16 bytes on cpu 3):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
backtrace (crc 0):
pcpu_alloc_noprof+0x453/0xd80
nft_counter_clone+0x9c/0x190 [nf_tables]
nft_expr_clone+0x8f/0x1b0 [nf_tables]
nft_dynset_new+0x2cb/0x5f0 [nf_tables]
nft_rhash_update+0x236/0x11c0 [nf_tables]
nft_dynset_eval+0x11f/0x670 [nf_tables]
nft_do_chain+0x253/0x1700 [nf_tables]
nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x18d/0x270 [nf_tables]
nf_hook_slow+0xaa/0x1e0
ip_local_deliver+0x209/0x330
Pass NULL to nft_set_elem_expr_destroy() given stateful expressions do
not require context at this stage.
Fixes: 563125a73ac3 ("netfilter: nftables: generalize set extension to support for several expressions")
Reported-by: Gurpreet Shergill <giki.shergill@proton.me>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
Compile-tested only at this stage.
include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h | 2 ++
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 4 ++--
net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c | 7 ++++++-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
index ea6f29ad7888..3c8a60ec1cc4 100644
--- a/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
+++ b/include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
@@ -878,6 +878,8 @@ struct nft_elem_priv *nft_set_elem_init(const struct nft_set *set,
u64 timeout, u64 expiration, gfp_t gfp);
int nft_set_elem_expr_clone(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_set *set,
struct nft_expr *expr_array[]);
+void nft_set_elem_expr_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
+ struct nft_set_elem_expr *elem_expr);
void nft_set_elem_destroy(const struct nft_set *set,
const struct nft_elem_priv *elem_priv,
bool destroy_expr);
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 15801a9a099e..2f19c155069e 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -6747,8 +6747,8 @@ static void __nft_set_elem_expr_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
}
}
-static void nft_set_elem_expr_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
- struct nft_set_elem_expr *elem_expr)
+void nft_set_elem_expr_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
+ struct nft_set_elem_expr *elem_expr)
{
struct nft_expr *expr;
u32 size;
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
index 7807d8129664..31c5a5b52ce1 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_dynset.c
@@ -36,12 +36,17 @@ static int nft_dynset_expr_setup(const struct nft_dynset *priv,
for (i = 0; i < priv->num_exprs; i++) {
expr = nft_setelem_expr_at(elem_expr, elem_expr->size);
if (nft_expr_clone(expr, priv->expr_array[i], GFP_ATOMIC) < 0)
- return -1;
+ goto err_out;
elem_expr->size += priv->expr_array[i]->ops->size;
}
return 0;
+err_out:
+ /* Stateful expression do not need context, pass NULL. */
+ nft_set_elem_expr_destroy(NULL, elem_expr);
+
+ return -1;
}
struct nft_elem_priv *nft_dynset_new(struct nft_set *set,
--
2.47.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH nf] nf_tables: nft_dynset: fix possible stateful expression memleak in error path
2026-03-12 10:11 [PATCH nf] nf_tables: nft_dynset: fix possible stateful expression memleak in error path Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2026-03-12 11:02 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-12 11:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2026-03-12 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso; +Cc: netfilter-devel
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> If cloning the second stateful expression in the element via GFP_ATOMIC
> fails, then the first stateful expression remains in place without being
> released.
>
> unreferenced object (percpu) 0x607b97e9cab8 (size 16):
> comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294931867
> hex dump (first 16 bytes on cpu 3):
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> backtrace (crc 0):
> pcpu_alloc_noprof+0x453/0xd80
> nft_counter_clone+0x9c/0x190 [nf_tables]
> nft_expr_clone+0x8f/0x1b0 [nf_tables]
> nft_dynset_new+0x2cb/0x5f0 [nf_tables]
> nft_rhash_update+0x236/0x11c0 [nf_tables]
> nft_dynset_eval+0x11f/0x670 [nf_tables]
> nft_do_chain+0x253/0x1700 [nf_tables]
> nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x18d/0x270 [nf_tables]
> nf_hook_slow+0xaa/0x1e0
> ip_local_deliver+0x209/0x330
>
> Pass NULL to nft_set_elem_expr_destroy() given stateful expressions do
> not require context at this stage.
static void nft_connlimit_do_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
struct nft_connlimit *priv)
{
nf_ct_netns_put(ctx->net, ctx->family);
nf_conncount_cache_free(priv->list);
kfree(priv->list);
}
I think minimal fake context could work though, the clone wasn't
exposed to other cpus yet.
Other than this patch looks correct to me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH nf] nf_tables: nft_dynset: fix possible stateful expression memleak in error path
2026-03-12 11:02 ` Florian Westphal
@ 2026-03-12 11:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-12 11:56 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2026-03-12 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Westphal; +Cc: netfilter-devel
On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 12:02:37PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > If cloning the second stateful expression in the element via GFP_ATOMIC
> > fails, then the first stateful expression remains in place without being
> > released.
> >
> > unreferenced object (percpu) 0x607b97e9cab8 (size 16):
> > comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294931867
> > hex dump (first 16 bytes on cpu 3):
> > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > backtrace (crc 0):
> > pcpu_alloc_noprof+0x453/0xd80
> > nft_counter_clone+0x9c/0x190 [nf_tables]
> > nft_expr_clone+0x8f/0x1b0 [nf_tables]
> > nft_dynset_new+0x2cb/0x5f0 [nf_tables]
> > nft_rhash_update+0x236/0x11c0 [nf_tables]
> > nft_dynset_eval+0x11f/0x670 [nf_tables]
> > nft_do_chain+0x253/0x1700 [nf_tables]
> > nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x18d/0x270 [nf_tables]
> > nf_hook_slow+0xaa/0x1e0
> > ip_local_deliver+0x209/0x330
> >
> > Pass NULL to nft_set_elem_expr_destroy() given stateful expressions do
> > not require context at this stage.
>
> static void nft_connlimit_do_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> struct nft_connlimit *priv)
> {
> nf_ct_netns_put(ctx->net, ctx->family);
> nf_conncount_cache_free(priv->list);
> kfree(priv->list);
> }
>
> I think minimal fake context could work though, the clone wasn't
> exposed to other cpus yet.
>
> Other than this patch looks correct to me.
It is following this path:
static void nft_connlimit_destroy_clone(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const struct nft_expr *expr)
{
struct nft_connlimit *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
nf_conncount_cache_free(priv->list);
kfree(priv->list);
}
But I will post a v2 setting nft_ctx anyway.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH nf] nf_tables: nft_dynset: fix possible stateful expression memleak in error path
2026-03-12 11:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2026-03-12 11:56 ` Florian Westphal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Westphal @ 2026-03-12 11:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso; +Cc: netfilter-devel
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2026 at 12:02:37PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> > > If cloning the second stateful expression in the element via GFP_ATOMIC
> > > fails, then the first stateful expression remains in place without being
> > > released.
> > >
> > > unreferenced object (percpu) 0x607b97e9cab8 (size 16):
> > > comm "softirq", pid 0, jiffies 4294931867
> > > hex dump (first 16 bytes on cpu 3):
> > > 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > > backtrace (crc 0):
> > > pcpu_alloc_noprof+0x453/0xd80
> > > nft_counter_clone+0x9c/0x190 [nf_tables]
> > > nft_expr_clone+0x8f/0x1b0 [nf_tables]
> > > nft_dynset_new+0x2cb/0x5f0 [nf_tables]
> > > nft_rhash_update+0x236/0x11c0 [nf_tables]
> > > nft_dynset_eval+0x11f/0x670 [nf_tables]
> > > nft_do_chain+0x253/0x1700 [nf_tables]
> > > nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x18d/0x270 [nf_tables]
> > > nf_hook_slow+0xaa/0x1e0
> > > ip_local_deliver+0x209/0x330
> > >
> > > Pass NULL to nft_set_elem_expr_destroy() given stateful expressions do
> > > not require context at this stage.
> >
> > static void nft_connlimit_do_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> > struct nft_connlimit *priv)
> > {
> > nf_ct_netns_put(ctx->net, ctx->family);
> > nf_conncount_cache_free(priv->list);
> > kfree(priv->list);
> > }
> >
> > I think minimal fake context could work though, the clone wasn't
> > exposed to other cpus yet.
> >
> > Other than this patch looks correct to me.
>
> It is following this path:
>
> static void nft_connlimit_destroy_clone(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
> const struct nft_expr *expr)
> {
> struct nft_connlimit *priv = nft_expr_priv(expr);
>
> nf_conncount_cache_free(priv->list);
> kfree(priv->list);
> }
Oh, I see -- you are right, this follows the destroy_expr special case.
> But I will post a v2 setting nft_ctx anyway.
Thanks, I find it hard to assert correctness otherwise.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-12 11:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-12 10:11 [PATCH nf] nf_tables: nft_dynset: fix possible stateful expression memleak in error path Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-12 11:02 ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-12 11:33 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-12 11:56 ` Florian Westphal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox