public inbox for netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nf-next PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink_hook: Dump nat type chains
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 17:04:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abwegj2TijkaQVLz@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260313153220.19662-1-phil@nwl.cc>

Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc> wrote:
> These chains are indirectly attached to the hook since they are
> not called for packets belonging to an established connection.
> 
> Introduce NF_HOOK_OP_NAT to identify the container and dump attached
> entries instead of the container itself.

Please lets not do this.

Before:

        hook postrouting {
                +0000000100 nf_nat_ipv6_out [nf_nat]
                +2147483647 nf_confirm [nf_conntrack]
        }

After:
        hook postrouting {
                +0000200000 chain inet nat postrouting [nft_chain_nat]
                +2147483647 nf_confirm [nf_conntrack]
        }

... and thats not true.  The nat chain isn't hooked at 200000.

It hooks at +100, this is a dispatcher.
Concealing the actual hook location and then unrolling the embedded
nat hooks gives a wrong impression and will mislead users wrt. the
actual ordering.

If we really want the ability to list the nat hooks, I think this
needs a new command to dump them.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-19 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-13 15:32 [nf-next PATCH] netfilter: nfnetlink_hook: Dump nat type chains Phil Sutter
2026-03-19 16:04 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2026-03-19 16:59   ` Phil Sutter
2026-03-19 17:06     ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-19 21:08       ` Phil Sutter
2026-03-20  0:24         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-20 10:17           ` Phil Sutter
2026-03-20 11:11             ` Phil Sutter
2026-03-20 11:18               ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-20 11:26                 ` Phil Sutter
2026-03-20 11:36                   ` Phil Sutter
2026-03-20 11:47                     ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-20 12:09                       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-20 12:27                         ` Phil Sutter
2026-03-20 11:45                   ` Florian Westphal
2026-03-20 11:46                   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abwegj2TijkaQVLz@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=phil@nwl.cc \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox