public inbox for netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: fw@strlen.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: reject immediate NF_QUEUE verdict
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 23:49:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <acxBg87ddKWwbhtI@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260331214145.976722-1-pablo@netfilter.org>

On Tue, Mar 31, 2026 at 11:41:45PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> nft_queue is always used from userspace nftables to deliver the NF_QUEUE
> verdict, reject immediate NF_QUEUE verdict.

Actually, a bit terse description, maybe this version is better:

    netfilter: nf_tables: reject immediate NF_QUEUE verdict
    
    nft_queue is always used from userspace nftables to deliver the NF_QUEUE
    verdict. Immediately emitting an NF_QUEUE verdict is never used by the
    userspace nft tools, so reject immediate NF_QUEUE verdicts.
    
    The arp family does not provide queue support, but such an immediate
    verdict is still reachable. Globally reject NF_QUEUE immediate verdicts
    to address this issue.

> Fixes: f342de4e2f33 ("netfilter: nf_tables: reject QUEUE/DROP verdict parameters")
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> ---
>  net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> index 3922cff1bb3d..8c42247a176c 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
> @@ -11667,8 +11667,6 @@ static int nft_verdict_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_data *data,
>  	switch (data->verdict.code) {
>  	case NF_ACCEPT:
>  	case NF_DROP:
> -	case NF_QUEUE:
> -		break;
>  	case NFT_CONTINUE:
>  	case NFT_BREAK:
>  	case NFT_RETURN:
> @@ -11703,6 +11701,11 @@ static int nft_verdict_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_data *data,
>  
>  		data->verdict.chain = chain;
>  		break;
> +	case NF_QUEUE:
> +		/* The nft_queue expression is used for this purpose, an
> +		 * immediate NF_QUEUE verdict should not ever be seen here.
> +		 */
> +		fallthrough;
>  	default:
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.47.3
> 
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31 21:41 [PATCH nf] netfilter: nf_tables: reject immediate NF_QUEUE verdict Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-03-31 21:49 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=acxBg87ddKWwbhtI@chamomile \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox