Linux Netfilter development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, Xiang Mei <xmei5@asu.edu>,
	Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: x_tables: add late validate callback for nft_compat sake
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:59:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aeS1iwP8ra-yU_Qu@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aeSzcx9YmM3usuez@chamomile>

Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 12:45:05PM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > x_tables and nftables are fundamentally different.
> > In x_tables, one gets the full ruleset graph via setsockopt().
> > ->checkentry() gets called at ruleset validation time.
> > 
> > In nf_tables, you get a transactional request (rule add in this case)
> > in netlink format.  At this time, it is not yet knowm from which
> > basechain(s) the new expression is reachable.
> >
> > In nf_tables, there is one final hook validation pass right before the
> > point-of-no-return when the new state is fully known.
> >
> > However, nft_compat calls the x_tables checkentry functions way too
> > early, at expression instantiation time, when we have the netlink
> > info available but not the base chain info (not yet known).
> 
> There used to be full validation of the table in each transaction in
> nf_tables.
> 
> What happened?

As far as I can see this never worked correctly.

A few matches/targets perform hook_mask checks in ->checkentry(), but
nft_compat calls ->checkentry() at expression init stage, which is too
early and only catches problems if the target/match is called from
basechain.

iptables-nft -t raw -A PREROUTING -p tcp -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu
-> rejected at expression init time from ->checkentry()

iptables-nft -t raw -N FOO
iptables-nft -t raw -A FOO -p tcp -j TCPMSS --clamp-mss-to-pmtu
-> works, non-basechain
iptables-nft -t raw -A PREROUTING -j FOO
-> works before this patch: ->checkentry not called again
(and we can't call it twice either as these functions are allowed
 to have side effects such as proc file creation, kmalloc etc).

I don't see another practicable solution for this problem except
this hack.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-19 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-19 10:45 [PATCH nf] netfilter: x_tables: add late validate callback for nft_compat sake Florian Westphal
2026-04-19 10:50 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-04-19 10:59   ` Florian Westphal [this message]
2026-04-19 11:06     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-04-19 11:19       ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aeS1iwP8ra-yU_Qu@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox