From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nft_ct: support expectation creation for natted flows
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:08:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akOVqk9WOTpIKCss@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630060311.2504-1-fw@strlen.de>
Hi Florian,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2026 at 08:03:08AM +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> This feature only works for connections originating from the host
> and only if there no source address rewrite.
>
> Add the needed nat glue to have the expectation follow the original
> nat binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
> ---
> v2:
> add missing nf_ct_expect_iterate_destroy() in exit handler
> fix buld with CONFIG_NF_NAT=n
>
> net/netfilter/nft_ct.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
> index 03a88c77e0f0..95fc3d7c1edb 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
> @@ -1297,6 +1297,17 @@ static int nft_ct_expect_obj_dump(struct sk_buff *skb,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
> +static void nft_ct_nat_follow_master(struct nf_conn *ct, struct nf_conntrack_expect *this)
> +{
> + const struct nf_ct_helper_expectfn *expfn;
> +
> + expfn = nf_ct_helper_expectfn_find_by_name("nat-follow-master");
> + if (expfn)
> + expfn->expectfn(ct, this);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static void nft_ct_expect_obj_eval(struct nft_object *obj,
> struct nft_regs *regs,
> const struct nft_pktinfo *pkt)
> @@ -1342,6 +1353,13 @@ static void nft_ct_expect_obj_eval(struct nft_object *obj,
> priv->l4proto, NULL, &priv->dport);
> exp->timeout += priv->timeout;
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
> + if (ct->status & IPS_NAT_MASK) {
> + exp->saved_proto.tcp.port = priv->dport;
> + exp->dir = !dir;
> + exp->expectfn = nft_ct_nat_follow_master;
> + }
> +#endif
> if (nf_ct_expect_related(exp, 0) != 0)
> regs->verdict.code = NF_DROP;
>
> @@ -1416,6 +1434,13 @@ static int __init nft_ct_module_init(void)
> return err;
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
> +static bool __exit expect_iter_nat(struct nf_conntrack_expect *exp, void *data)
> +{
> + return exp->expectfn == nft_ct_nat_follow_master;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static void __exit nft_ct_module_exit(void)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_TIMEOUT
> @@ -1425,6 +1450,11 @@ static void __exit nft_ct_module_exit(void)
> nft_unregister_obj(&nft_ct_helper_obj_type);
> nft_unregister_expr(&nft_notrack_type);
> nft_unregister_expr(&nft_ct_type);
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NF_NAT)
> + nf_ct_expect_iterate_destroy(expect_iter_nat, NULL);
> + synchronize_rcu();
> +#endif
Not sure sashiko is signalling a real issue here.
static void __exit nf_nat_cleanup(void)
{
struct nf_nat_proto_clean clean = {};
nf_ct_iterate_destroy(nf_nat_proto_clean, &clean);
all NATted master conntracks are destroyed here, including their
expectations, which might have the expectations using
nat_follow_master.
nf_ct_iterate_cleanup()
nf_ct_delete()
clean_from_lists()
nf_ct_remove_expectation()
And nf_nat_cleanup() can only be called if all there is no more nat
chains in place, correct?
If so, no new expectations can be created using nat_follow_master and
this nf_ct_iterate_destroy() is implicitly removing the remaining
expectations using nat_follow_master.
Sorry for the long writing, I don't see it where the issue is.
> }
>
> module_init(nft_ct_module_init);
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 6:03 [PATCH nf-next v2] netfilter: nft_ct: support expectation creation for natted flows Florian Westphal
2026-06-30 10:08 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2026-06-30 11:04 ` Florian Westphal
2026-06-30 14:20 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akOVqk9WOTpIKCss@chamomile \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox