From: "Marc Aurèle La France" <tsi@tuyoix.net>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter REJECT: Fix destination MAC in RST packets
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:39:44 -0700 (Mountain Standard Time)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.20.2103102037030.2800@CLUIJ> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311000212.GA21480@salvia>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3571 bytes --]
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 04:51:26PM -0700, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:25:28PM -0700, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:21:20AM -0700, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 8 Mar 2021, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 06:16:34PM -0700, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
>>>>>>>> In the non-bridge case, the REJECT target code assumes the REJECTed
>>>>>>>> packets were originally emitted by the local host, but that's not
>>>>>>>> necessarily true when the local host is the default route of a subnet
>>>>>>>> it is on, resulting in RST packets being sent out with an incorrect
>>>>>>>> destination MAC.  Address this by refactoring the handling of bridged
>>>>>>>> packets which deals with a similar issue.  Modulo patch fuzz, the
>>>>>>>> following applies to v5 and later kernels.
>>>>>>> The code this patch updates is related to BRIDGE_NETFILTER. Your patch
>>>>>>> description refers to the non-bridge case. What are you trying to
>>>>>>> achieve?
>>>>>> Via DHCP, my subnet's default route is a Linux system so that it can monitor
>>>>>> all outbound traffic.  By doing so, for example, I have determined that my
>>>>>> Android phone connects to Facebook despite the fact that I have no such app
>>>>>> installed.  I want to know, and control, what other behind-the-scenes
>>>>>> (under-handed) traffic devices on my subnet generate.
>>>>>>> dev_queue_xmit() path should not be exercised from the prerouting
>>>>>>> chain, packets generated from the IP later must follow the
>>>>>>> ip_local_out() path.
>>>>>> Well, I can tell you dev_queue_xmit() does in fact work in prerouting
>>>>>> chains, as it must for the bridging case.  The only potential problem I've
>>>>>> found so far is that the RST packet doesn't go through any netfilter hooks.
>>>>> That's the issue, Netfilter rejects code from the IP layer, so the
>>>>> packets follows the ip_local_out() path.
>>>> ... which sets an incorrect destination MAC.  Also, in this case, netfilter
>>>> doesn't reject any such thing.  It doesn't even "see" the RST packet
>>>> dev_queue_xmit() sends out.  That's OK as there is no further need to
>>>> process such a packet.
>>> dev_queue_xmit() skips the policy in the local out path for the
>>> generated RST packet. If you want to plain reject using
>>> dev_queue_xmit() then you have to use the ingress hook.
>>>> At least, the device whose connection request is being denied
>>>> doesn't hang anymore...
>>> The neighbour cache selects the destination MAC from the destination
>>> IP address of the RST packet.
>>> Your patch also refers to non-bridge scenario (no br_netfilter in
>>> place).
>>> Could you describe what you're trying to achieve in plain layman terms?
>> I will (re-)do no such thing because you are refusing to make sense.
>> It's OK that the bridge code uses dev_queue_xmit() to send out an RST packet
>> that has correct MACs, but that doesn't make another trip through netfilter.
> It's not OK that the bridge uses dev_queue_xmit().
> That was an ugly solution to make the REJECT target work from
> br_netfilter, because there was absolutely no other better way at that
> time to make it work.
> There has been now native support to reject traffic from the bridge
> from many years on through br_forward(), which is the way to go.
Ah, the cart before the horse.  I'll wait.
Later.
Marc.
     prev parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-11  3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-08  1:16 [PATCH nf] netfilter REJECT: Fix destination MAC in RST packets Marc Aurèle La France
2021-03-08 10:25 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-03-08 16:21   ` Marc Aurèle La France
2021-03-09  1:36     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-03-09  4:25       ` Marc Aurèle La France
2021-03-09 10:27         ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-03-10 23:51           ` Marc Aurèle La France
2021-03-11  0:02             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2021-03-11  3:39               ` Marc Aurèle La France [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox
  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):
  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.WNT.2.20.2103102037030.2800@CLUIJ \
    --to=tsi@tuyoix.net \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
  Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
  before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).