From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
horms@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, ja@ssi.bg
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/12] netfilter: flowtable: store ethertype in flowtable context
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 22:36:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <anzZQBvrnNOhQfjK@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260812013444.1674732-1-kuba@kernel.org>
On Tue, Aug 11, 2026 at 06:34:44PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> This is an AI-generated review of your patch. The human sending this
> email has considered the AI review valid, or at least plausible.
> ---
> netfilter: flowtable: store ethertype in flowtable context
>
> This adds an ether_type field to struct nf_flowtable_ctx, sets it while
> parsing the layer 2 header in nf_flow_skb_encap_protocol(), and replaces
> the local inner_proto computations in nf_flow_tuple_encap() and
> nf_flow_skb_encap_protocol() with reads of ctx->ether_type. The IPv4 and
> IPv6 lookup helpers now compare ctx->ether_type themselves instead of
> passing an expected protocol down.
>
> No Link: tags in the commit header.
>
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
> > index 7692ae7aa8539..3f417a43bd122 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
> > @@ -161,7 +162,6 @@ static void nf_flow_tuple_encap(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> > struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct flow_offload_tuple *tuple)
> > {
> > - __be16 inner_proto = skb->protocol;
> > struct vlan_ethhdr *veth;
> > struct pppoe_hdr *phdr;
> > struct ipv6hdr *ip6h;
> > @@ -179,19 +179,17 @@ static void nf_flow_tuple_encap(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> > veth = (struct vlan_ethhdr *)skb_mac_header(skb);
> > tuple->encap[i].id = ntohs(veth->h_vlan_TCI);
> > tuple->encap[i].proto = skb->protocol;
> > - inner_proto = veth->h_vlan_encapsulated_proto;
> > offset += VLAN_HLEN;
> > break;
> > case htons(ETH_P_PPP_SES):
> > phdr = (struct pppoe_hdr *)skb_network_header(skb);
> > tuple->encap[i].id = ntohs(phdr->sid);
> > tuple->encap[i].proto = skb->protocol;
> > - inner_proto = *((__be16 *)(phdr + 1));
> > offset += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - switch (inner_proto) {
> > + switch (ctx->ether_type) {
> > case htons(ETH_P_IP):
> > iph = (struct iphdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + offset);
> > if (ctx->tun.inner_proto == IPPROTO_IPIP) {
>
> [Severity: Medium]
>
> Does this hunk change behaviour for PPPoE frames rather than just moving
> the ethertype into the context?
>
> Before this patch, the PPPoE arm fed the raw PPP protocol id into the
> switch:
>
> net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c:nf_flow_tuple_encap() {
> case htons(ETH_P_PPP_SES):
> ...
> inner_proto = *((__be16 *)(phdr + 1));
> offset += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
> break;
> }
>
> switch (inner_proto) {
> case htons(ETH_P_IP):
> ...
> }
>
> PPP_IP is 0x0021 and PPP_IPV6 is 0x0057, so inner_proto could never equal
> htons(ETH_P_IP) (0x0800) or htons(ETH_P_IPV6) (0x86dd), and PPPoE frames
> always landed in the default: arm. That left
> tuple->tun.{src_v4,dst_v4,src_v6,dst_v6} and tuple->tun.inner_proto zero
> even when nf_flow_skb_encap_protocol() -> nf_flow_ip4_tunnel_proto() had
> already set ctx->tun.inner_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP.
>
> After the patch, ctx->ether_type for PPPoE is the value normalised by
> __nf_flow_pppoe_proto() in include/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table.h:
>
> switch (proto) {
> case htons(PPP_IP):
> return htons(ETH_P_IP);
> case htons(PPP_IPV6):
> return htons(ETH_P_IPV6);
> }
>
> so these tunnel arms now execute for PPPoE traffic and populate
> tuple->tun.
>
> struct flow_offload_tunnel tun sits before the __hash marker in struct
> flow_offload_tuple, so it is part of the rhashtable lookup key, and the
> control path always installs non-zero endpoints for tunnel flows:
>
> net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_core.c:flow_offload_fill_tuple() {
> flow_tuple->tun = route->tuple[dir].in.tun;
> flow_tuple->encap_num = route->tuple[dir].in.num_encaps;
> }
>
> filled from DEV_PATH_TUN in nft_dev_path_info(), which can be walked
> together with DEV_PATH_PPPOE in the same path stack (ipip or ip6tnl over a
> PPPoE underlay). That means PPPoE encapsulated IPIP/IP6IP6 rx flows
> previously missed their flowtable entry on every packet and now start
> matching.
>
> Should the commit message mention this, and should a Fixes: tag be added
> pointing at ab427db17885 ("netfilter: flowtable: Add IPIP rx sw
> acceleration") and d98103575dcd ("netfilter: flowtable: Add IP6IP6 rx sw
> acceleration"), which introduced the raw PPP id versus ETH_P_* comparison?
> As written, the message only says "Store the ether_type in the context
> after parsing the layer 2 header for the first time and then use it later
> on", which reads as a pure cleanup.
I will make sure this reaches -stable at some point as this fixes ipip
and ip6ip6 over pppoe.
> The behaviour persists to the end of the series (nf_flow_tuple_encap() at
> 839e6caf13c7 still switches on ctx->ether_type), so no later patch
> documents or reverts it.
>
> > @@ -389,22 +387,27 @@ static bool nf_flow_skb_encap_protocol(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> > return false;
> >
> > veth = (struct vlan_ethhdr *)skb_mac_header(skb);
> > - if (veth->h_vlan_encapsulated_proto == proto) {
> > - ctx->offset += VLAN_HLEN;
> > - inner_proto = proto;
> > - ret = true;
> > - }
> > + ctx->ether_type = veth->h_vlan_encapsulated_proto;
> > + ctx->offset += VLAN_HLEN;
> > + ret = true;
> > break;
> > case htons(ETH_P_PPP_SES):
> > - if (nf_flow_pppoe_proto(skb, &inner_proto) &&
> > - inner_proto == proto) {
> > - ctx->offset += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
> > - ret = true;
> > - }
> > + if (!nf_flow_pppoe_proto(skb, ðer_type))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + ctx->ether_type = ether_type;
> > + ctx->offset += PPPOE_SES_HLEN;
> > + ret = true;
> > + break;
>
> This is the store of the normalised ETH_P_* value that nf_flow_tuple_encap()
> later consumes for PPPoE frames.
>
> [ ... ]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-12 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-10 19:40 [PATCH net-next 00/12] Netfilter updates for net Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 01/12] netfilter: add DEBUG_NET_WARN_ON_ONCE to skb_set_nfct() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-12 1:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 7:20 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-14 19:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 02/12] net: pass net_device_path_ctx to dev_fill_forward_path() Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 03/12] net: netfilter: add ether_type to net_device_path_ctx and use it Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-12 1:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 20:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 04/12] netfilter: flowtable: rename tun.l3_proto to tun.inner_proto Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 05/12] netfilter: flowtable: rename ctx.tun.proto to ctx.tun.inner_proto Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 06/12] netfilter: flowtable: store ethertype in flowtable context Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-12 1:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 20:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 07/12] netfilter: flowtable: move ipv4 and ipv6 xmit path to function Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 08/12] netfilter: flowtable: detach layer 2 encapsulation parser from lookup Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 09/12] netfilter: nft_ct: move custom expectation support to helper Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-12 1:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 20:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 10/12] netfilter: conntrack: always lower timeout for non-closing RST packets Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 11/12] netfilter: nf_conntrack_expect: bail out on insert dead expectations Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-12 1:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-08-12 20:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-10 19:40 ` [PATCH net-next 12/12] selftests: netfilter: conntrack_dump_flush: remove unused variables and fix typo Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-08-14 19:25 ` [PATCH net-next 00/12] Netfilter updates for net Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=anzZQBvrnNOhQfjK@chamomile \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox