From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [nf PATCH v3] netfilter: nfnetlink: Fix for interrupted hook dumps
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 15:57:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aqAUL70ynrF6cT0G@orbyte.nwl.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqACYYwn1pYp735Z@chamomile>
On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 02:41:05PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2026 at 11:23:03AM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > Hi Pablo,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 07, 2026 at 08:19:47PM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 02:52:15PM +0200, Phil Sutter wrote:
> > > > @@ -338,27 +337,47 @@ nfnl_hook_entries_head(u8 pf, unsigned int hook, struct net *net, const char *de
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static int nfnl_hook_dump_nat(struct sk_buff *nlskb,
> > > > - const struct nfnl_dump_hook_data *ctx,
> > > > - const struct nf_hook_ops *ops,
> > > > - int family, unsigned int seq)
> > > > + struct netlink_callback *cb,
> > > > + const struct nf_hook_ops *ops, int family)
> > > > {
> > > > struct nf_nat_lookup_hook_priv *priv = ops->priv;
> > > > - struct nf_hook_entries *e = rcu_dereference(priv->entries);
> > > > + struct nfnl_dump_hook_data *ctx = cb->data;
> > > > + struct net *net = sock_net(nlskb->sk);
> > > > struct nf_hook_ops **nat_ops;
> > > > - int i, err;
> > > > + unsigned int i = cb->args[1];
> > > > + struct nf_hook_entries *e;
> > > > + unsigned int base_seq;
> > > > + int err = 0;
> > > >
> > > > + base_seq = smp_load_acquire(&net->nf.nat_hook_base_seq);
> > >
> > > Maybe annnotate this base sequence in the .start via:
> > >
> > > struct netlink_dump_control c = {
> > > .start = ...;
> > >
> > > We should probably start doing this in other nfnetlink subsystems too.
> > >
> > > This will help catch an interference between two netlink recv() calls
> > > which results in calling netlink_dump() which calls this function.
> >
> > I do not comprehend, sorry. The concurrent hook dumps have distinct cb
> > buffers and net->nf.{nat_,}hook_base_seq is shared but read-only. How
> > does the problematic interference happen?
>
> See nf_tables_dump_rules_start() for instance. It allocates the struct
> nft_rule_dump_ctx, which is reachable through .start, .dump and .done
> callbacks. I think it should be possible to annotate the current
> base_seq at the beginning of the netlink dump from .start in a ctx
> object. Then, use it from .dump to check if dump is consistent (ie.
> turn on the NLM_F_DUMP_INTR flag).
>
> So, instead of fetching the current sequence from .dump like this:
>
> cb->seq = nft_base_seq(net);
>
> Use the sequence available in the new ctx object, ie. from .dump path
> you do this:
>
> cb->seq = ctx->seq;
But to detect a concurrent hook update between to .dump callback calls
(if skb space was exceeded), the current value in per-net data has to
be fetched, no? So this would have to look like this in .dump callback:
| ctx->seq = nft_base_seq(net);
| cb->seq = ctx->seq;
Then I don't get the detour via struct nfnl_dump_hook_data. Or is it
possible we get multiple concurrent dump requests on the same netlink
socket and thus cb->seq (and cb->prev_seq) gets shared between them?
> Because netlink_dump() is called for each userspace recv() call (netlink
> delivers the chunked listing in several messages), this would allow
> userspace to know that the listing is inconsistent, then optionally
> retry.
>
> Makes sense to you?
Not quite, sorry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-04 12:52 [nf PATCH v3] netfilter: nfnetlink: Fix for interrupted hook dumps Phil Sutter
2026-09-07 18:19 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-08 9:23 ` Phil Sutter
2026-09-08 12:41 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-09-08 13:57 ` Phil Sutter [this message]
2026-09-09 0:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aqAUL70ynrF6cT0G@orbyte.nwl.cc \
--to=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox