Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: nft_set_rbtree: skip transaction elements during GC

[Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 10:08:22AM +0800, bestswngs@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>
> 
> Since nft_set_commit_update() runs set commit callbacks before processing
> NEWSETELEM transactions, nft_rbtree_gc_scan() can observe elements added by
> the transaction being committed.
> 
> The scan records an interval end in rbe_end without checking the element's
> transaction state. A later, unrelated expired start then moves both
> elements to the expired list. The synchronous GC queue can free the new end
> element before the transaction subsequently activates it, causing a
> use-after-free.
> 
> Only consider elements that are fully active in both generations. This
> keeps transaction-state elements out of the GC scan and preserves interval
> pairing across skipped elements.
> 
> KASAN reports:
> 
>   BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in nft_setelem_activate
>   nft_setelem_activate net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7047
>   nf_tables_commit net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:11137
> 
>   Allocated by task 130:
>   nft_set_elem_init net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:6794
>   nft_add_set_elem net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:7523
> 
>   Freed by task 130:
>   nft_trans_gc_trans_free net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:10506
>   rcu_core kernel/rcu/tree.c:2919
> 
> Fixes: 1e3b9e1c77fe ("netfilter: nf_tables: call set ops .commit when building new ruleset blob")
> Reported-by: <co+ee5e50ef2670e5f4@bugs.sh>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Weiming Shi <bestswngs@gmail.com>

Patch is fine. It is not possible to add or delete an expired element,
expired elements should not ever be in a transaction then.

> ---
>  net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
> index 9894832281c4b..12431b55752fb 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_set_rbtree.c
> @@ -900,6 +900,8 @@ static void nft_rbtree_gc_scan(struct nft_set *set)
>  		next = rb_next(node);
>  
>  		rbe = rb_entry(node, struct nft_rbtree_elem, node);
> +		if (!nft_set_elem_active(&rbe->ext, NFT_GENMASK_ANY))
> +			continue;
>  
>  		/* elements are reversed in the rbtree for historical reasons,
>  		 * from highest to lowest value, that is why end element is
> -- 
> 2.55.0
>