From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Ren Wei <weir@nebusec.ai>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org,
phil@nwl.cc, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, horms@kernel.org,
kaber@trash.net, vega@nebusec.ai, caoruide123@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf 1/1] netfilter: ecache: bound destroy event redelivery
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 23:03:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <arLtL4Azj6d7Juxe@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48840876b129e0094fbd8048e96fb6e3fae51055.1787158072.git.vega.cover-letter@nebusec.ai>
Ren Wei <weir@nebusec.ai> wrote:
> From: Ruide Cao <caoruide123@gmail.com>
>
> A conntrack whose destroy event cannot be delivered is kept on the
> per-netns ecache list while the workqueue retries the notification.
> The worker stops at the first failure and retries every 10 ms without
> a lifetime limit. A listener that enables NETLINK_BROADCAST_ERROR and
> never drains its receive queue can therefore retain conntracks and
> keep the worker busy indefinitely.
Yes, that's by design. This feature intentionally blocks new
conntracks.
> + if (!cnet->ecache.retry_deadline)
> + cnet->ecache.retry_deadline = jiffies + ECACHE_RETRY_TIMEOUT;
> +
> + if (time_after_eq(jiffies, cnet->ecache.retry_deadline)) {
> + hlist_nulls_for_each_entry_safe(h, n, &cnet->ecache.dying_list,
> + hnnode) {
> + struct nf_conn *ct = nf_ct_tuplehash_to_ctrack(h);
> +
> + hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].hnnode);
> + hlist_nulls_add_head(&ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].hnnode,
> + &evicted_list);
> + }
> + ret = STATE_DONE;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
I doubt this is correct. Userspace that can deal with missing destroy
events SHOULD NOT enable reliable event delivery mode.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-22 17:39 [PATCH nf 0/1] netfilter: ecache: bound destroy event redelivery Ren Wei
2026-09-22 17:39 ` [PATCH nf 1/1] " Ren Wei
2026-09-22 21:03 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=arLtL4Azj6d7Juxe@strlen.de \
--to=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=caoruide123@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=vega@nebusec.ai \
--cc=weir@nebusec.ai \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox