From: "Chris Taylor" <chtaylo4@gmail.com>
To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Notification of new/destroyed connection
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:49:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba7529fb0702271449p460843fag8528aab89261ee84@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hello all,
Newbie warning!! I was trying to fool around with netfilter and
nf_conntrack. I'd like to write a netfilter module that takes action
when a new connection is opened or closed.
Initially I thought about taking the sk_buff and pass it to
nf_ct_get_tuple and then call nf_conntrack_find_get and if it returns
null then I it's a new connection. But I can't find a way to use this
to see if a connection has been closed.
Then I saw the notification chains and I thought about makeing a
notification block and registering it with
nf_conntrack_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb). I couldn't
find the initial listing of the anticiapted values for the events and
the void* p, but I saw examples in
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c So I then turned my attention to
include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h and saw the difference
b/n ip_conntrack_expect_events and ip_conntrack_events, namely that
ip_conntrack_expect_events only has IPEXP_NEW.
Am I correct to assume that if I need to do some setup in advance of a
connection establishment, then I should subscribe via the
nf_conntrack_register_expect_notifier and wait for a IPEXP_NEW event?
What happenes if I do the setup and the connection is never
established? Will I get notified of that via the callback registered
with nf_conntrack_register_notifier with a IPCT_DESTROY event?
Am I better off doing this with nf_conntrack or ip_conntrack? What's
the difference?
Am I headed in the correct direction?
Thanx in advance.
Respectfully,
Christopher Taylor
next reply other threads:[~2007-02-27 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-27 22:49 Chris Taylor [this message]
2007-02-28 12:39 ` Notification of new/destroyed connection Pablo Neira Ayuso
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-12 8:00 Kerry Ó Cuanacháin
2007-07-12 9:13 Kerry Ó Cuanacháin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ba7529fb0702271449p460843fag8528aab89261ee84@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chtaylo4@gmail.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).