From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from m16.mail.163.com (m16.mail.163.com [117.135.210.2]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E79173320; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 07:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.2 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718092728; cv=none; b=p/Ajnku+Rlg1pYbyaHuaXGAEgG0haW2uq+xOfXX5HKQAGyyLcZFZiX2rbQHX4TeEac18nkFyGNvgjB5/qYTkqaqj3x7aPS9CFNxgy0/7LNKlvNMrYotcydvbUsRFTTE5Uzdb1iffzXgcaaCP/L/fKo2DFpeA4vF+nVwun5OC7oY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718092728; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CS7CMvTxSk7CyhSPH+19x6CjS6eE7Q7coTMCFgaeI+Y=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=rRa9/j05VOWgZ9rOEyGfFMiXFdaoDPv8PTDTaHyEF1vulxMyqOpCTzxW5hKrfsQymXwVrTdM3ZGbgQcF4iGO3eG/PGQP8r+L0lYGk++bQdJiEPNDmadVLXt0bb9PTpb2GdJc8Yt7FUxdITKvD053fBNQ43e6udqEADg4I9LAI0c= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b=ZOTj1mSF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=117.135.210.2 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=163.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com header.i=@163.com header.b="ZOTj1mSF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From: Content-Type; bh=yoRsE3XMCqVssz/yXETnkP2iLCRZh1VO87wImbfmzoE=; b=ZOTj1mSFWeu190IXHKw2QR3wN2OPtUQezhvlRlRDMKY7WUg6jHQfrOrDOlu7rK L3CDXag8zzpVLppKYsiW6mqVBM9lj+8QpAgMCTLQB+PAVRY4lZf3izdBIGNnbypR 2+csc/fmmPHpaUJ9Kdiy0OyEZzQkXAPhpLT+Xy1PqS9Dk= Received: from [172.22.5.12] (unknown [27.148.194.72]) by gzga-smtp-mta-g1-3 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wA3PymGA2hmh78JHw--.60394S2; Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:57:59 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 15:58:02 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/3] selftests: add selftest for the SRv6 End.DX4 behavior with netfilter To: Pablo Neira Ayuso , Jakub Kicinski Cc: Hangbin Liu , wujianguo , netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, contact@proelbtn.com, dsahern@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, fw@strlen.de References: <20240604144949.22729-1-wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn> <20240604144949.22729-3-wujianguo@chinatelecom.cn> <20240605173532.304798bd@kernel.org> <20240605192309.591dfedb@kernel.org> From: Jianguo Wu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CM-TRANSID:_____wA3PymGA2hmh78JHw--.60394S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjvJXoW3Xr15tF4Dtw1DuF4fJFyDtrb_yoWfWF4UpF s8G3y3tr4UWF1Yyw4vkryIvFnxtrZ3Ga4j9r98C34rAwnFgw1UGa1Skay7WanrWrWDtrW3 AF1Utw13Zws8t3DanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDUYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07UOzV8UUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: 5zxmxt5qjx0iiqw6il2tof0z/1tbiRAr6kGVODLAC+QAAsI Hi, Pablo On 2024/6/6 13:46, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2024 at 07:23:09PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> On Thu, 6 Jun 2024 10:10:44 +0800 Hangbin Liu wrote: >>>> Please follow the instructions from here: >>>> https://github.com/linux-netdev/nipa/wiki/How-to-run-netdev-selftests-CI-style >>>> the kernel we build for testing is minimal. >>>> >>>> We see this output: >>>> >>>> # ################################################################################ >>>> # TEST SECTION: SRv6 VPN connectivity test with netfilter enabled in routers >>>> # ################################################################################ >>> >>> If I run the test specifically, I also got error: >>> sysctl: cannot stat /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_hooks_lwtunnel: No such file or directory >>> >>> This is because CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK is build as module. The test need to load >>> nf_conntrack specifically. I guest the reason you don't have this error is >>> because you have run the netfilter tests first? Which has loaded this module. > > Hm, this dependency with conntrack does not look good. This sysctl > nf_hooks_lwtunnel should be in the netfilter core. The connection > tracking gets loaded on demand, the availability of this sysctl is > fragile. > How about this? [PATCH] netfilter: move the sysctl nf_hooks_lwtunnel into the netfilter core Currently, the sysctl net.netfilter.nf_hooks_lwtunnel depends on the nf_conntrack module, but the nf_conntrack module is not always loaded. Therefore, accessing net.netfilter.nf_hooks_lwtunnel may have an error. Move sysctl nf_hooks_lwtunnel into the netfilter core. Fixes: 7a3f5b0de364 ("netfilter: add netfilter hooks to SRv6 data plane") Suggested-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso Signed-off-by: Jianguo Wu --- include/net/netns/netfilter.h | 3 ++ net/netfilter/core.c | 13 ++++++- net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c | 15 -------- net/netfilter/nf_hooks_lwtunnel.c | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ net/netfilter/nf_internals.h | 6 +++ 5 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/net/netns/netfilter.h b/include/net/netns/netfilter.h index 02bbdc5..a6a0bf4 100644 --- a/include/net/netns/netfilter.h +++ b/include/net/netns/netfilter.h @@ -15,6 +15,9 @@ struct netns_nf { const struct nf_logger __rcu *nf_loggers[NFPROTO_NUMPROTO]; #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL struct ctl_table_header *nf_log_dir_header; +#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL + struct ctl_table_header *nf_lwtnl_dir_header; +#endif #endif struct nf_hook_entries __rcu *hooks_ipv4[NF_INET_NUMHOOKS]; struct nf_hook_entries __rcu *hooks_ipv6[NF_INET_NUMHOOKS]; diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c index 3126911..b00fc28 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/core.c +++ b/net/netfilter/core.c @@ -815,12 +815,21 @@ int __init netfilter_init(void) if (ret < 0) goto err; +#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL + ret = netfilter_lwtunnel_init(); + if (ret < 0) + goto err_lwtunnel_pernet; +#endif ret = netfilter_log_init(); if (ret < 0) - goto err_pernet; + goto err_log_pernet; return 0; -err_pernet: +err_log_pernet: +#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL + netfilter_lwtunnel_fini(); +err_lwtunnel_pernet: +#endif unregister_pernet_subsys(&netfilter_net_ops); err: return ret; diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c index 74112e9..6c40bdf 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_standalone.c @@ -22,9 +22,6 @@ #include #include #include -#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL -#include -#endif #include static bool enable_hooks __read_mostly; @@ -612,9 +609,6 @@ enum nf_ct_sysctl_index { NF_SYSCTL_CT_PROTO_TIMEOUT_GRE, NF_SYSCTL_CT_PROTO_TIMEOUT_GRE_STREAM, #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL - NF_SYSCTL_CT_LWTUNNEL, -#endif NF_SYSCTL_CT_LAST_SYSCTL, }; @@ -946,15 +940,6 @@ enum nf_ct_sysctl_index { .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_jiffies, }, #endif -#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL - [NF_SYSCTL_CT_LWTUNNEL] = { - .procname = "nf_hooks_lwtunnel", - .data = NULL, - .maxlen = sizeof(int), - .mode = 0644, - .proc_handler = nf_hooks_lwtunnel_sysctl_handler, - }, -#endif }; static struct ctl_table nf_ct_netfilter_table[] = { diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_hooks_lwtunnel.c b/net/netfilter/nf_hooks_lwtunnel.c index 00e89ff..11712d2 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_hooks_lwtunnel.c +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_hooks_lwtunnel.c @@ -3,6 +3,9 @@ #include #include #include +#include + +#include "nf_internals.h" static inline int nf_hooks_lwtunnel_get(void) { @@ -50,4 +53,69 @@ int nf_hooks_lwtunnel_sysctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_hooks_lwtunnel_sysctl_handler); + +static struct ctl_table nf_lwtunnel_sysctl_table[] = { + { + .procname = "nf_hooks_lwtunnel", + .data = NULL, + .maxlen = sizeof(int), + .mode = 0644, + .proc_handler = nf_hooks_lwtunnel_sysctl_handler, + }, + {}, +}; + +static int nf_lwtunnel_net_init(struct net *net) +{ + struct ctl_table *table; + struct ctl_table_header *hdr; + + table = nf_lwtunnel_sysctl_table; + if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) { + table = kmemdup(nf_lwtunnel_sysctl_table, + sizeof(nf_lwtunnel_sysctl_table), + GFP_KERNEL); + if (!table) + goto err_alloc; + } + + hdr = register_net_sysctl_sz(net, "net/netfilter", table, + ARRAY_SIZE(nf_lwtunnel_sysctl_table)); + if (!hdr) + goto err_reg; + + net->nf.nf_lwtnl_dir_header = hdr; + return 0; + +err_reg: + if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) + kfree(table); +err_alloc: + return -ENOMEM; +} + +static void __net_exit nf_lwtunnel_net_exit(struct net *net) +{ + const struct ctl_table *table; + + table = net->nf.nf_lwtnl_dir_header->ctl_table_arg; + unregister_net_sysctl_table(net->nf.nf_lwtnl_dir_header); + if (!net_eq(net, &init_net)) + kfree(table); +} + +static struct pernet_operations nf_lwtunnel_net_ops = { + .init = nf_lwtunnel_net_init, + .exit = nf_lwtunnel_net_exit, +}; + +int __init netfilter_lwtunnel_init(void) +{ + return register_pernet_subsys(&nf_lwtunnel_net_ops); +} + +void __exit netfilter_lwtunnel_fini(void) +{ + unregister_pernet_subsys(&nf_lwtunnel_net_ops); +} #endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */ diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_internals.h b/net/netfilter/nf_internals.h index 832ae64..5c281b7 100644 --- a/net/netfilter/nf_internals.h +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_internals.h @@ -29,6 +29,12 @@ /* nf_log.c */ int __init netfilter_log_init(void); +#ifdef CONFIG_LWTUNNEL +/* nf_hooks_lwtunnel.c */ +int __init netfilter_lwtunnel_init(void); +void __exit netfilter_lwtunnel_fini(void); +#endif + /* core.c */ void nf_hook_entries_delete_raw(struct nf_hook_entries __rcu **pp, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg); -- 1.8.3.1 >> Ah, quite possibly, good catch! We don't reboot between tests, >> and the VM must have run 10 or so other tests before. >> >>>> # Warning: Extension rpfilter revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module? >>>> # iptables v1.8.8 (nf_tables): RULE_APPEND failed (No such file or directory): rule in chain PREROUTING >>>> # Warning: Extension rpfilter revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module? >>>> # iptables v1.8.8 (nf_tables): RULE_APPEND failed (No such file or directory): rule in chain PREROUTING >>> >>> Just checked, we need CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_RPFILTER=m in config file. >> >> :( Must be lack of compat support then? I CCed netfilter, perhaps they >> can advise. I wonder if there is a iptables-nftables compatibility list >> somewhere. > > iptables-nft potentially requires all CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_* and > CONFIG_IP_NF_TARGET_* extensions, in this new testcase it uses > rpfilter which seems not to be used in any of the existing tests so > far, that is why CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_RPFILTER=m is required. And this? diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/config b/tools/testing/selftests/net/config index 04de7a6..d4891f7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/config +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/config @@ -101,3 +101,5 @@ CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_MATCH_POLICY=m CONFIG_CRYPTO_ARIA=y CONFIG_XFRM_INTERFACE=m CONFIG_XFRM_USER=m +CONFIG_IP_NF_MATCH_RPFILTER=m +CONFIG_IP6_NF_MATCH_RPFILTER=m