From: Samir Bellabes <sam@synack.fr>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>,
Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@ioremap.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/9] snet: introduce snet_netlink.c and snet_netlink.h
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:15:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2k4vjhgoi.fsf@ssh.synack.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B420464.3040301@trash.net> (Patrick McHardy's message of "Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:08:20 +0100")
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> writes:
>> +static struct genl_ops snet_genl_ops[] = {
>> + {
>> + .cmd = SNET_C_VERSION,
>> + .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
>> + .policy = snet_genl_policy,
>> + .doit = snet_nl_version,
>> + .dumpit = NULL,
>
> The NULL initializations aren't neccessary.
>
[...]
Instead of dropping lines with the NULL initializations, I reduced the
code with a declaration macro
Patricks, thanks
sam
commit f8539d466dbe081b35f6813cfedd91947615bee9
Author: Samir Bellabes <sam@synack.fr>
Date: Fri Jan 15 09:53:09 2010 +0100
snet: reducing code by using macros to define snet_genl_ops
This patch introduces the macro SNET_GENL_OPS. This reduces the code of the
declaration struct genl_ops snet_genl_ops[]
Signed-off-by: Samir Bellabes <sam@synack.fr>
diff --git a/security/snet/snet_netlink.c b/security/snet/snet_netlink.c
index e108e7a..ba6a26d 100644
--- a/security/snet/snet_netlink.c
+++ b/security/snet/snet_netlink.c
@@ -400,70 +400,33 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+#define SNET_GENL_OPS(_cmd, _flags, _policy, _op, _opname) \
+ { \
+ .cmd = _cmd, \
+ .flags = _flags, \
+ .policy = _policy, \
+ ._op = snet_nl_##_opname, \
+ }
+
static struct genl_ops snet_genl_ops[] = {
- {
- .cmd = SNET_C_VERSION,
- .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .policy = snet_genl_policy,
- .doit = snet_nl_version,
- .dumpit = NULL,
- },
- {
- .cmd = SNET_C_REGISTER,
- .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .policy = snet_genl_policy,
- .doit = snet_nl_register,
- .dumpit = NULL,
- },
- {
- .cmd = SNET_C_UNREGISTER,
- .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .policy = snet_genl_policy,
- .doit = snet_nl_unregister,
- .dumpit = NULL,
- },
- {
- .cmd = SNET_C_INSERT,
- .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .policy = snet_genl_policy,
- .doit = snet_nl_insert,
- .dumpit = NULL,
- },
- {
- .cmd = SNET_C_REMOVE,
- .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .policy = snet_genl_policy,
- .doit = snet_nl_remove,
- .dumpit = NULL,
- },
- {
- .cmd = SNET_C_FLUSH,
- .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .policy = snet_genl_policy,
- .doit = snet_nl_flush,
- .dumpit = NULL,
- },
- {
- .cmd = SNET_C_LIST,
- .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .policy = snet_genl_policy,
- .doit = NULL,
- .dumpit = snet_nl_list,
- },
- {
- .cmd = SNET_C_VERDICT,
- .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .policy = snet_genl_policy,
- .doit = snet_nl_verdict,
- .dumpit = NULL,
- },
- {
- .cmd = SNET_C_VERDICT_DELAY,
- .flags = GENL_ADMIN_PERM,
- .policy = snet_genl_policy,
- .doit = snet_nl_verdict_delay,
- .dumpit = NULL,
- },
+ SNET_GENL_OPS(SNET_C_VERSION, GENL_ADMIN_PERM, snet_genl_policy,
+ doit, version),
+ SNET_GENL_OPS(SNET_C_REGISTER, GENL_ADMIN_PERM, snet_genl_policy,
+ doit, register),
+ SNET_GENL_OPS(SNET_C_UNREGISTER, GENL_ADMIN_PERM, snet_genl_policy,
+ doit, unregister),
+ SNET_GENL_OPS(SNET_C_INSERT, GENL_ADMIN_PERM, snet_genl_policy,
+ doit, insert),
+ SNET_GENL_OPS(SNET_C_REMOVE, GENL_ADMIN_PERM, snet_genl_policy,
+ doit, remove),
+ SNET_GENL_OPS(SNET_C_FLUSH, GENL_ADMIN_PERM, snet_genl_policy,
+ doit, flush),
+ SNET_GENL_OPS(SNET_C_REGISTER, GENL_ADMIN_PERM, snet_genl_policy,
+ dumpit, list),
+ SNET_GENL_OPS(SNET_C_REGISTER, GENL_ADMIN_PERM, snet_genl_policy,
+ doit, verdict),
+ SNET_GENL_OPS(SNET_C_VERDICT_DELAY, GENL_ADMIN_PERM, snet_genl_policy,
+ doit, verdict_delay),
};
static __init int snet_netlink_init(void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-15 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-02 13:04 [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 1/9] lsm: add security_socket_closed() Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 18:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 2/9] Revert "lsm: Remove the socket_post_accept() hook" Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 18:36 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-05 0:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-01-05 0:38 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 3/9] snet: introduce security/snet, Makefile and Kconfig changes Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 18:39 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-06 6:04 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 4/9] snet: introduce snet_core.c and snet.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 14:43 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-06 18:23 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-06 19:46 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-06 19:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2010-01-23 2:07 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-23 2:18 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2010-01-07 14:34 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-07 14:53 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-07 14:58 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-08 4:32 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 18:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-06 6:12 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 5/9] snet: introduce snet_event.c and snet_event.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 20:09 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2010-01-02 23:38 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 19:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-08 7:21 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-08 15:34 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-08 17:44 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-08 17:51 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-08 18:10 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 6/9] snet: introduce snet_hooks.c and snet_hook.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 20:13 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2010-01-03 11:10 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-03 19:16 ` Stephen Hemminger
2010-01-03 22:26 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 7/9] snet: introduce snet_netlink.c and snet_netlink.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-04 15:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-13 4:19 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 4:28 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 5:36 ` Patrick McHardy
2010-01-13 4:36 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 4:41 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 6:03 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-13 6:20 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-15 7:02 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-15 9:15 ` Samir Bellabes [this message]
2010-01-16 1:59 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-17 5:42 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-23 19:33 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 8/9] snet: introduce snet_verdict.c and snet_verdict.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-02 13:04 ` [RFC 9/9] snet: introduce snet_utils.c and snet_utils.h Samir Bellabes
2010-01-03 16:57 ` [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls jamal
2010-01-05 7:26 ` Samir Bellabes
2010-01-05 8:20 ` Tetsuo Handa
2010-01-05 14:09 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-06 0:23 ` [PATCH] LSM: Update comment on security_sock_rcv_skb Tetsuo Handa
2010-01-06 3:27 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2010-01-10 21:53 ` James Morris
2010-01-10 16:20 ` [RFC 0/9] snet: Security for NETwork syscalls jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2k4vjhgoi.fsf@ssh.synack.fr \
--to=sam@synack.fr \
--cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).