From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Johan_Fredrik_=D8hman?= Subject: REJECT in PREROUTING Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:18:19 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <000001c2dde4$f79479a0$f767f081@shuttle> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2DDED.5958E1A0" Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2DDED.5958E1A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry if this question has been asked before, but: =20 Is there any good reasons, technically or political, to disallow the = REJECT target in the PREROUTING table? =20 Thanks =20 JF=D8 ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2DDED.5958E1A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sorry if this question has been asked before, = but:

Is there any good reasons, technically or political, = to disallow the REJECT target in the PREROUTING table?

Thanks

JF=D8

------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C2DDED.5958E1A0--