From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@sterenborg.info>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: RE: Wol Magic Packets
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:45:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000301c6c740$93b6e870$0101000a@tanjian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <J4H7AL$3755F2FB0EF94967751D3C49D3390021@libero.it>
claudio987@libero.it <mailto:claudio987@libero.it> wrote:
>> On Wed, August 23, 2006 11:33, claudio987\@libero\.it wrote:
>>> exsists a module that can recognize Magic packet used in wake on
>>> lan?
>>
>> No, not specifically.
>>
>>> I'd like to drop Magic packets
>>
...
>>
>> Port 7/udp being echo and port 9/udp being discard, I don't see why
>> you couldn't block these ports.
>>
> 7 and 9 are default ports but Magica packets can also be
> trasmitted trought other ports:
> http://www.depicus.com/wake-on-lan/woli.aspx
> as you can see, here you can specify port number.
Yes. Well, I also received an email from Sietske van Zanen who thought
more thoroughly than I did, but he hit the wrong butten and it was not
sent to the list.
This was his answer and I have to agree with him:
[quote]
I do not see what use it is, to block this on your firewall. WoL is a
broadcast, hence it will already never traverse a firewall if it's
configured correctly. On the local LAN segment they will never pass a
firewall before reaching a LAN station. That's the whole idea of
broadcasting.
The best thing to do is disable WoL on the workstations.
-Sietse
[/quote]
Gr,
Rob
next parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-24 5:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <J4H7AL$3755F2FB0EF94967751D3C49D3390021@libero.it>
2006-08-24 5:45 ` Rob Sterenborg [this message]
2006-08-29 11:38 Wol Magic Packets claudio987
2006-08-29 11:55 ` Rob Sterenborg
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-28 19:45 claudio987
2006-08-29 5:54 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-08-28 13:03 claudio987
2006-08-28 16:25 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-08-24 16:00 claudio987
[not found] <J4I52P$07AD17049DE455463CE6BF9E6D425F69@libero.it>
2006-08-24 12:48 ` Rob Sterenborg
2006-08-23 9:33 claudio987
2006-08-23 10:13 ` Rob Sterenborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000301c6c740$93b6e870$0101000a@tanjian' \
--to=rob@sterenborg.info \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox