From: "Hard__warE" <hard__ware@hotmail.com>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW?
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 12:35:35 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000501c21415$544d0e40$7b0010ac@dynamicaccess.lan> (raw)
>>On Wed, 8 May 2002, Ing. Christian Ogris wrote:
>> I connect from Box A via SSH to Box B, where the firewall runs, and i
>>get the state "NEW" on the first packet.
>> Then - the first connection is still established - i connect AGAIN from
>>Box A to Box B and do NOT get the state "NEW" anymore. (So obviously
>> it's already accepted by the ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT rule).
>> Is this behavior correct?
>No. But so far nobody has reported such an ill-behaviour. I assume
>something is wrong in your setup/logging.
>
>Regards,
>Jozsef
I have tested this as im running SSH ans as you can see hear in the print
out of my packets that
i dont even need a Established Related Rule for SSH from the Internet or
Internaly , this is handled
by IP_conntrack moddule and so on .. :-) .
(Notice My SSH Box has its own IP on the Firewall (yet i have still
restricted access to the box as only SSH)
Chain OUTPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
51 38424 ACCEPT all -- * eth0 172.16.0.22
172.16.0.0/16
/> netstat -C
Active Internet connections (w/o servers)
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 0 yes-dave.dynamicacc:ssh 172.16.0.123:2867
ESTABLISHED
Active UNIX domain sockets (w/o servers)
&
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State
tcp 0 0 yes-dave.dynamicacc:ssh 172.16.0.123:2872
ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 yes-dave.dynamicacc:ssh 172.16.0.123:2871
ESTABLISHED
tcp 0 0 yes-dave.dynamicacc:ssh 172.16.0.123:2867
ESTABLISHED
Active UNIX domain sockets (w/o servers)
Proto RefCnt Flags Type State I-Node Path
when i connect the first time (have not logged on yet) my SSH server says
the connecttion is already
ESTABLISHED and not NEW , and thats the same for evey connection after this
. The reason behind this is
SSH needs to establish a ESTABLISHED connection to the server before any
data is correctly Encrypted .. :D
next reply other threads:[~2002-06-15 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-15 2:35 Hard__warE [this message]
2002-06-15 12:33 ` Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW? Matthew Hellman
2002-06-15 14:52 ` Chris
2002-06-15 12:35 ` default gateway problem Kumar
2002-06-15 12:48 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-15 21:57 ` Flag SYN not necessarily state NEW? Jozsef Kadlecsik
2002-06-16 18:04 ` Geog Hofstetter
2002-06-16 18:30 ` Antony Stone
2002-06-16 19:20 ` [x] - " Geog Hofstetter
[not found] <20020507115906.8B112471A@lists.samba.org>
2002-05-08 6:45 ` Ing. Christian Ogris
2002-06-14 11:17 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000501c21415$544d0e40$7b0010ac@dynamicaccess.lan' \
--to=hard__ware@hotmail.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox