Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christian Ericsson" <christian.ericsson@bigfoot.com>
To: "Netfilter (E-mail)" <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Bug in FORWARD chain in iptables-1.2.7a with Linux kernel 2.4.20?
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:16:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000701c33989$aa826180$64a5a8c0@europe.cellnetwork.com> (raw)

Hi,

I have the following configuration:

INTERNET
|
Firewall (Linux box with IPTables)
|
Router (Linux box with IPTables)


The default policy in the FORWARD chain in the Firewall is set to DROP
packets. So, I have to insert a rule for every traffic I want to accept.

The Router logs all traffic:

iptables --append INPUT   -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix "IPTABLES
LOG INPUT "
iptables --append FORWARD -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix "IPTABLES
LOG FORWARD "
iptables --append OUTPUT  -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix "IPTABLES
LOG OUTPUT "


I don't have any rule in the Firewall which ACCEPT traffic to the Router.
But, when I try to access the Router from INTERNET, the Router will log that
packet which the Firewall should DROP!!!

If I try to ping the router from INTERNET, the Router will log:

Jun 23 15:01:23 Router kernel: IPTABLES FILTER DROP INPUT IN=eth0 OUT=
MAC=XX SRC=A-HOST DST=Router PROTO=ICMP
8
Jun 23 15:01:23 Router kernel: IPTABLES FILTER DROP OUTPUT IN= OUT=eth0
SRC=Router DST=A-HOST PROTO=ICMP


It gets even more strange if I also log the traffic which the Firewall
should DROP, i.e. last rule in the FORWARD chain on the Firewall is:

iptables --append -j LOG --log-level debug --log-prefix "IPTABLES DROP
FORWARD "

The Firewall will log:

Jun 23 15:07:59 Firewall kernel: IPTABLES DROP FORWARD IN=eth3 OUT=eth0
SRC=Router DST=A-HOST PROTO=ICMP

eth0 is connected to INTERNET and eth3 is connected to the Router. Shouldn't
it be the other way around? The Firewall should of course DROP this packet
(the default policy is to DROP packets).


What could be wrong? Do I have to upgrade to the latest version of iptables
and the Linux kernel?


Yours sincerely,

Christian Ericsson



             reply	other threads:[~2003-06-23 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-06-23 13:16 Christian Ericsson [this message]
2003-06-24 15:42 ` Bug in FORWARD chain in iptables-1.2.7a with Linux kernel 2.4.20? Ramin Dousti
2003-06-26 15:58 ` Bug in FORWARD chain in iptables-1.2.7a with Linux kernel 2.4.20? >>> SOLVED !!! Christian Ericsson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-23 13:46 Bug in FORWARD chain in iptables-1.2.7a with Linux kernel 2.4.20? Christian Ericsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000701c33989$aa826180$64a5a8c0@europe.cellnetwork.com' \
    --to=christian.ericsson@bigfoot.com \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox