From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Stefano Petroianni" Subject: Packets lost by ip_queue Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:25:48 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <000801c304ed$3e3b74b0$c709c082@ace17> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C304FE.017C6640" Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C304FE.017C6640 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi everyone, I'm a beginner in this field. I'm working with netfilter in the = user-space. I'm having some problem with ip_queue. When I try to filter large bandwidths or packet-number (for example a = traffic of 50.000pkt/sec with 128bytes/pkt) I have an high number of lost packets even if I increase the length of = the ip_queue. Any advice? Thanks. Stefano. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C304FE.017C6640 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi everyone,

I'm a beginner in this field. I'm = working with=20 netfilter in the user-space.

I'm having some problem with = ip_queue.

When I try to filter large bandwidths = or=20 packet-number (for example a traffic of 50.000pkt/sec with=20 128bytes/pkt)

I have an high number of lost = packets even if=20 I increase the length of the ip_queue.

Any advice?

Thanks.

Stefano.

------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C304FE.017C6640--