From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "RRuegner" Subject: call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng tested with kernel 2.4.25 failed for h323 Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:28:53 +0100 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <000e01c3fca7$2a561b50$32640a0a@robopc> References: <20040225182828.GP13386@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> <001101c3fbd6$0310ed80$32640a0a@robopc> <20040225202805.GA4040@obroa-skai.de.gnumonks.org> <000701c3fc81$ad0543d0$32640a0a@robopc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Harald Welte Cc: Netfilter Development Mailinglist , Netfilter Mailinglist Hi Harald, the h323 pom ng patch failed for kernel 2.4.25 with same failure message as to the 2.6.3 kernel in my machine Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: "RRuegner" To: "Harald Welte" ; "rruegner" Cc: "Netfilter Development Mailinglist" ; "Netfilter Mailinglist" Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 5:00 PM Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng > Hi Harald, > i know your question, but where is the list which modules will fit to kernel > 2.6.3, i have to setup a firewall machine and i wanna use 2.6.3 and want to > know which newnat will compile clean at now. > It would be nice to see a small info at the netfilter page > about that. > Alltough i understood pom ng as a special redesign > for the new kernel now i understand that this is only > a redesign of pom. > I know youre heavy buisy but do have the info i need?. > If there arent any nat mods compile clean to > 2.6.3 i will switch back to 2.4 latest, and i will see what ng does to it. > Best Regards > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Harald Welte" > To: "rruegner" > Cc: "Netfilter Development Mailinglist" > ; "Netfilter Mailinglist" > > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:28 PM > Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] call for testing of patch-o-matic-ng > > >