From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Erik Ahlner" Subject: Re: Network bandwidth usage monitor Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 18:23:47 +0100 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <001101c2cecd$ac743670$0200a8c0@whyzpc> References: <001001c2cec6$d6310b20$0200a8c0@whyzpc> <1044636705.7633.1.camel@tech004> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi again! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Leblond" To: Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 5:51 PM Subject: Re: Network bandwidth usage monitor On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 17:34, Erik Ahlner wrote: > Hi! > > I have used IPtraf for measuring how much of my network is beeing used for a > while now, but since I got 100mbit connection it doesn't fulfill my > needs..when downloading thing in 5 megabytes/second, Iptraf says > 300kb/second.. not very accurate huh? -traffic monitor in iptraf is not really accurate. use "detailed -statitistc information". It's really more accurate. Sorry I wasn't more precise, i actually use the detailed statistics information when i get these inaccurate values! Erik