From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn Mall" Subject: Performance Decrease Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 13:54:35 -0700 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <001201c31411$b3ccaa40$c90c010a@TMCSHAWN> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C313D7.07277A70" Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C313D7.07277A70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am running iptables version 1.2.2 -- This has never been an issue = until I have begun to do some bandwidth intensive stuff. I also had a = friend of mine point this out as well... There seems to be a huge performance decrease when using iptables. I am = not sure where the bottleneck is occuring. My friend has a 3Mbit/sec = pipe, was getting about 500kb/sec on average, and since implenting = iptables, is only receiving about 50kb/sec. That is a huge decrease. Can = anybody point out what is going wrong? Thanks, Shawn ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C313D7.07277A70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I am running iptables version 1.2.2 -- = This has=20 never been an issue until I have begun to do some bandwidth intensive = stuff. I=20 also had a friend of mine point this out as well...
 
There seems to be a huge performance = decrease when=20 using iptables. I am not sure where the bottleneck is occuring. My = friend has a=20 3Mbit/sec pipe, was getting about 500kb/sec on average, and since = implenting=20 iptables, is only receiving about 50kb/sec. That is a huge decrease. Can = anybody=20 point out what is going wrong?
 
Thanks,
Shawn
------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C313D7.07277A70--