From: "Wilfried BARNAVON" <wbarnavon@on-fire.net>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
Cc: Netfilter Mailinglist <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>,
Netfilter Development Mailinglist
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
technique@on-fire.net
Subject: Re: Daily svn snapshots now working again (was Re: patch-o-matic-ng stopped ?)
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:49:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001201c6f86e$b39671b0$fa00a8c0@dolphin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20061024113551.GN6045@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org
Hello Harald,
Thank you to have answered me so quickly. I gonna test that.
Good health to you too !
Wilfried
Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> said:
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:17:12PM +0200, Wilfried BARNAVON wrote:
> I was used to test new linux kernels with
> experimental patches for netfilter, and - oh surprise !- the last month
> patch-o-matic-ng archives are more and more little, and finally with a
> null content !
You can find the current patch-o-matic-ng repository at
http://svn.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/patch-o-matic-ng/
> What happens ? Is this the end of a centralized and structured
> iptables developpement ? Is there a break in the developpement team ?
patch-o-matic[-ng] alwayas was a collection of various contributions
from people around the net, not a form of centralized and structured
development
> Is there a secret replacement of netfilter that justifies this
> carelessness ?
nobody is careless. you just seem to be the first person to report that
problem to me.
> Just a bug in the patch-o-matic-ng "tar-gz" generator ?
Exactly. It's fixed now, please use the
ftp://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic-ng/snapshot/patch-o-matic-ng-20061024.tar.bz2
snapshot that I just created.
Cheers,
--
- Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org> http://netfilter.org/
============================================================================
"Fragmentation is like classful addressing -- an interesting early
architectural error that shows how much experimentation was going
on while IP was being designed." -- Paul Vixie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harald Welte" <laforge@netfilter.org>
To: "Wilfried BARNAVON" <wbarnavon@on-fire.net>
Cc: <technique@on-fire.net>; "Netfilter Development Mailinglist"
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>; "Netfilter Mailinglist"
<netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 1:35 PM
Subject: Daily svn snapshots now working again (was Re: patch-o-matic-ng
stopped ?)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-25 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1265.85.68.10.218.1161688632.squirrel@www.on-fire.net>
2006-10-24 11:35 ` Daily svn snapshots now working again (was Re: patch-o-matic-ng stopped ?) Harald Welte
2006-10-25 19:49 ` Wilfried BARNAVON [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001201c6f86e$b39671b0$fa00a8c0@dolphin' \
--to=wbarnavon@on-fire.net \
--cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=technique@on-fire.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox