From: "Jonathan" <jonathan@jonathan.abda.net>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: ways to lookup or query rules?
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 22:27:58 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001b01c4ab5c$df6c8ab0$2001a8c0@mantis> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20041006033804.67518.qmail@web50903.mail.yahoo.com
Thanks for the tip Jinsuk. That will save me some time messing around with
things.
It'll be unfortunately crude (especially in a script that is to be run every
minute), but it'll have to do.
Maybe queries/lookups are something for the future development of iptables?
It may not seem like something useful right now, but I bet once people had
the option,
they'd wonder how they lived without it.
(or as an old friend said, "it's kind of like a labotomy: once you've had
one *you don't know how you
ever lived without it*")
Jonathan
----- Original Message -----
From: "J Kim" <jindor@yahoo.com>
To: "Jonathan" <jonathan@jonathan.abda.net>
Cc: <netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: ways to lookup or query rules?
> Well, as far as I know there's no facility for lookup or query. I would
take
> the same approach as you do. One slight improvement is use iptables-save
> instead of -l option. The output of the former command looks better in
that its
> format is much closer to what you key in.
>
> Personally I put another layer between my code and iptables so that all
the
> iptables-related commands will go through it, letting it take care of the
> chores.
>
> Jinsuk Kim
>
> --- Jonathan <jonathan@jonathan.abda.net> wrote:
>
> > Hi, if this is a classic case of RTFM go ahead and shoot me.
> >
> > Is there an option or a command to look up rules in your iptables,
> > especially if there's the ability to search by rulenumber or some
> > kind of key?
> >
> > The only solution I've seen so far, is to use the -l option, capture the
> > output, and then process it, but that's a very dirty solution.
> > I'm writing a script that needs to update the iptables automatically,
and I
> > assume it needs to know whether ot use the add or update
> > option by verifying whether a rule exists, in order to decide whether to
> > update the rule, or add a new one.
> >
> > Jonathan
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-06 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-06 3:24 ways to lookup or query rules? Jonathan
2004-10-06 3:38 ` J Kim
2004-10-06 4:27 ` Jonathan [this message]
2004-10-06 7:41 ` Craig Steadman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001b01c4ab5c$df6c8ab0$2001a8c0@mantis' \
--to=jonathan@jonathan.abda.net \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox