From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Joel" Subject: Re: Is Linux IPTABLES firewall comparable with license Firewall Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 15:23:48 +0530 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <001c01c3955d$bc700160$61a1a0ca@lin> References: <20031018091807.26000.qmail@web20711.mail.yahoo.com> Reply-To: "Joel" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org, ads nat Linux based products generally use iptables for firewall. i dont know much checkpoint. firewall using iptables is mostly used on the internet.. if u know what u want to open and what u have to block then iptables is the ultimate choice. i dont have issues with it. joel ----- Original Message ----- From: "ads nat" To: Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 2:48 PM Subject: Is Linux IPTABLES firewall comparable with license Firewall > Hi, > I don't know whether this is right list for my > question. > > I am facing basic problem while convincing to users. I > have implemented IPTABLES firewall on my Linux 8.0 > server. I am frequently asked by users which > firewall/security measures are taken for my network. > My competitors use Checkpoint Firewall. > Can somebody guide me how to convince my users that > Linux IPTABLES Firewall is technically at par with > commercial Firewall such as checkpoint. > > Also if same security policies are adopted for > IPTABLES and checkpoint, Is IPTABLES technically at > par with commercial FIREWALLs? > > Thanks > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search > http://shopping.yahoo.com >