From: "Rob Sterenborg" <rob@sterenborg.info>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Is this firewall good enough?
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 11:56:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001d01c44e07$fbc1b490$1201a8c0@admin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20040609081453.75751.qmail@web14704.mail.yahoo.com
> > > 7. /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 53
> > --syn
> > > -j ACCEPT #DNS
> >
> > DNS uses udp for normal lookups. Only in special
> > cases tcp is used.
> >
> I noted --syn can only be used with protocol tcp. How
> do I write a similar rule to accept connections to udp
> port 53?
Packets with syn set are (almost ? someone please correct me if I'm
wrong) always in NEW state.
So, a similar rule would be :
iptables -A INPUT -p udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
which implies :
iptables -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -p udp \
--dport 53 -j ACCEPT
> I don't see a good explanation of tcp-flags either on
> iptables man pages or Packet Filtering HOWTO. What are
> meaning of SYN,ACK,FIN,RST,URG,PSH? What combinations
> can be logged/dropped?
A little info I found about tcp flags :
http://www.whitehats.ca/main/members/Seeker/seeker_tcp_header/seeker_tcp_header.html
http://www.spirit.com/Network/net0900.html
http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1524
I don't think it's all that you want to know about it but it's as much
as I could find right now.
Not sure what URG and PSH really do.
You could DROP :
- SYN,FIN SYN,FIN (Both SYN and FIN set in 1 packet.)
- SYN,RST SYN,RST (SYN and RST set, probably a scan)
- Anybody any additions, comments ?
Gr,
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-09 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-08 9:14 Is this firewall good enough? Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-08 9:42 ` Feizhou
2004-06-08 9:57 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-08 15:03 ` Feizhou
2004-06-08 15:23 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-08 20:11 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 9:48 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-09 10:03 ` Feizhou
2004-06-08 16:17 ` David Cannings
2004-06-08 20:14 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 9:28 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2004-06-09 9:57 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 11:05 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2004-06-09 13:18 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 13:23 ` Feizhou
2004-06-09 8:36 ` Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-08 9:44 ` Rob Sterenborg
2004-06-09 8:14 ` Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-09 9:56 ` Rob Sterenborg [this message]
2004-06-09 15:12 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-06-09 15:15 ` Aleksandar Milivojevic
2004-06-11 14:24 ` Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-08 9:55 ` Antony Stone
2004-06-08 12:38 ` Chris Brenton
2004-06-09 7:32 ` Sagara Wijetunga
2004-06-09 13:47 ` Chris Brenton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001d01c44e07$fbc1b490$1201a8c0@admin' \
--to=rob@sterenborg.info \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox