From: "Linux" <linux@usermail.com>
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: Fighting back
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:27:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002501c2be7f$fad767a0$6301a8c0@VAIO> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030117192237.66443.qmail@web40206.mail.yahoo.com
That's a very good point.
Hmmm... More thinking needed.
Linux_303
----- Original Message -----
From: "SBlaze" <dagent.geo@yahoo.com>
To: "Linux" <linux@usermail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2003 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: Fighting back
> I think its safe to say we would all like to give a little back to those
who
> repeatedly bombard us with useless scans... What you want to do can
> "theoretically" be done with the MIRROR jump. Should it be done? Probably
not.
>
> Once an attacker learns they are in a sence scaning themselves.... they
can
> easily go about some sort of spoofing method in which the SRC IP is a
target as
> opposed to himself. You could easily find yourself a man in the middle of
a DOS
> attack against someone.
>
> I wouldn't do this... but hey it's up to you
>
> SBlaze
>
>
> --- Linux <linux@usermail.com> wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I feel that rpc and netbois scans to my network from the outside are an
> > obvious attempt to see what I have open, and I'm sure all of you would
agree.
> > Because I run NFS only via my internal network, there are no machines
that
> > would connect via my external interface. I am going to institute a rule
that
> > will cause a person scanning on ports 32770:32789 and 137 to redirect
and
> > scan the ports on the src IP address. In essence, anyone scanning me,
will
> > be basically scanning themselves.
> >
> > All I am asking is for some input to this and whether it is a good idea
or
> > not.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Linux_303
> >
>
>
> =====
> "No touchy NO TOUCHY! Emperor Kuzko -=Emperor's New Groove=-"
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
> http://mailplus.yahoo.com
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-17 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030117192237.66443.qmail@web40206.mail.yahoo.com>
2003-01-17 23:27 ` Linux [this message]
2003-01-17 15:26 ` Fighting back Ranjeet Shetye
2003-01-18 1:41 ` Alistair Tonner
2003-01-17 18:57 Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002501c2be7f$fad767a0$6301a8c0@VAIO' \
--to=linux@usermail.com \
--cc=netfilter@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox