Linux Netfilter discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "R. Sterenborg" <rsterenborg@xs4all.nl>
To: netfilter@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: PPTP through masquerading gateway
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 08:17:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002601c22710$40e49f40$0401000a@win2k> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 000401c226d9$5cc37fb0$6b01a8c0@s3ac

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rowan Reid" <rreid@studio3arc.com>
Subject: RE: PPTP through masquerading gateway

> I'm using 2.4.18 I know not designed for the patch, My FS only
> Works with 2.4.18. Someone told me the 2.4.17rev2 Patch works
> With 2.4.18 it doesn't unless you use
>
> patch -p1 < netfilter-pptp-2.4.17-rev2.patch
>
Uhm. well, I don't use ReiserFS, I use ext3.
I can't help you with that.
A patch that's working voor 2.4.17 could also be working for 2.4.18, but I
don't know.
At work I have a test setup and I'll try it there.

> Correct me if I'm wrong doesn't the INSTALL file say you
> Need a 2.4.4 kernel in order for it to work.
>
No, it says :
PROBLEMS YOU MAY ENCOUNTER:

1) This package requires a 2.4.4 kernel, *or above*.

> > cd /usr/src/iptables-1.2.6a
> > make KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/linux
> > make install KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/linux
>
> Interesting you did this after compiling the kernel.
>
Hmm, I've thought about doing it before compiling the kernel, but the
iptables compilation process might be using things from the kernel (you have
to mention a KERNEL_DIR yourself or use the default one in Makefile).
Mind you again ; I'm not a C programmer so I can't read all that and that
means I might have it all wrong.
Anyway, I thought it couldn't hurt to compile the kernel first ; it's
patched already so that shouldn't be the problem.
And I have a working setup :o)

> bles-tutorial.
>
Heheh, yeah. Wasn't sure myself so I looked it up before posting ;o]

> I used the same commands to test it. I will try the order you used.
> Thanks for taking the time though.
> What I'm trying most desperatly not to do is have to revert back to ext2
> and a 2.4.17 kernel.
>
I'll try kernel 2.4.18 for you and let you know if it works for me.
Besides, if 2.4.18 failes, maybe you could switch to ext3 which is also
journalling ? (I don't know the cons and pros between the 2 so I'm not going
to talk about that. Just wanted to mention it.)

Good luck !

Rob



  reply	other threads:[~2002-07-09  6:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-08 18:16 PPTP through masquerading gateway Marc Riddle
2002-07-08 19:15 ` Aldo S. Lagana
2002-07-08 20:54   ` Rowan Reid
2002-07-08 21:06     ` Aldo S. Lagana
2002-07-08 22:19       ` Rowan Reid
2002-07-08 22:31     ` R. Sterenborg
2002-07-08 23:44       ` Rowan Reid
2002-07-09  6:17         ` R. Sterenborg [this message]
     [not found] <200207091052.55364.fabrice@celestix.com>
2002-07-09  2:08 ` Rowan Reid
     [not found] <000a01c22798$9a5773d0$0401000a@win2k>
2002-07-09 22:35 ` Rowan Reid
2002-07-10  6:10   ` R. Sterenborg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002601c22710$40e49f40$0401000a@win2k' \
    --to=rsterenborg@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=netfilter@lists.samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox